These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2174932)

  • 1. Current ethical issues in research.
    Horowitz HS
    J Am Coll Dent; 1990; 57(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 2174932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) was no help.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 16789306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Praise, for a change.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2004 May; 304(5674):1077. PubMed ID: 15155914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
    Price AR
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
    Price AR
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research ethics. Planned misconduct surveys meet stiff resistance.
    Holden C
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5598):1549. PubMed ID: 12446890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plagiarize or perish?
    Ready T
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Private investigations.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 May; 411(6834):129-30. PubMed ID: 11346758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters.
    Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C
    IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond compliance...is it too much to ask?
    Koski G
    IRB; 2003; 25(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 14870726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
    Scheetz MD
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research subject complains about how she was treated by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Dec; 20(12):7. PubMed ID: 16607709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The emperor is marching around buck naked.
    Noble JH
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():e541. PubMed ID: 22275411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Science and scandal: what can be done about scientific misconduct?
    Robinson A
    CMAJ; 1994 Sep; 151(6):831-4. PubMed ID: 8087757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beautification and fraud.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical challenges in neonatal research: Summary report of the ethics group of the newborn drug development initiative.
    Baer GR; Nelson RM;
    Clin Ther; 2006 Sep; 28(9):1399-407. PubMed ID: 17062312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.