These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21749687)

  • 1. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers.
    Toro MA; García-Cortés LA; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21749687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of genealogical coancestry in plant species using a pedigree reconstruction algorithm and application to an oil palm breeding population.
    Cros D; Sánchez L; Cochard B; Samper P; Denis M; Bouvet JM; Fernández J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2014 Apr; 127(4):981-94. PubMed ID: 24504554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-wide estimates of coancestry and inbreeding in a closed herd of ancient Iberian pigs.
    Saura M; Fernández A; Rodríguez MC; Toro MA; Barragán C; Fernández AI; Villanueva B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78314. PubMed ID: 24205195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
    Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population.
    Bink MC; Anderson AD; van de Weg WE; Thompson EA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Oct; 117(6):843-55. PubMed ID: 18592205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial selection with traditional or genomic relationships: consequences in coancestry and genetic diversity.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; García-Cortés LA; de Cara MÁ
    Front Genet; 2015; 6():127. PubMed ID: 25904933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.
    Fernández J; Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 15879510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: the effect of marker density and effective population size.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; de Cara MA; Fernández J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):38. PubMed ID: 24088414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes.
    Maenhout S; De Baets B; Haesaert G
    Theor Appl Genet; 2009 Apr; 118(6):1181-92. PubMed ID: 19224194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):887-901. PubMed ID: 21212234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes.
    de Cara MA; Fernández J; Toro MA; Villanueva B
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22059579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
    Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of single-sample estimators of effective population sizes from genetic marker data.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4692-711. PubMed ID: 27288989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of coancestry based on shared segments for maintaining genetic diversity.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; Sölkner J; de Cara MA; Mészáros G; Pérez O'Brien AM; Fernández J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 26991632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of relatedness among non-pedigreed Yakutian cryo-bank bulls using molecular data: implications for conservation and breed management.
    Tapio I; Tapio M; Li MH; Popov R; Ivanova Z; Kantanen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Jul; 42(1):28. PubMed ID: 20626845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preserving population allele frequencies in ex situ conservation programs.
    Saura M; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández J; Toro MA; Caballero A
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1277-87. PubMed ID: 18680505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two molecular measures of relatedness based on haplotype sharing.
    Edwards D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():383. PubMed ID: 26558877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.