These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21749687)

  • 41. Estimation of effective population size from the rate of coancestry in pedigreed populations.
    Cervantes I; Goyache F; Molina A; Valera M; Gutiérrez JP
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Feb; 128(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 21214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Weighting genomic and genealogical information for genetic parameter estimation and breeding value prediction in tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):612-617. PubMed ID: 29385460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use and abuse of genetic marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding.
    Taylor HR
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Aug; 5(15):3140-50. PubMed ID: 26357542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers.
    Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4646-56. PubMed ID: 22818479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations.
    Caballero A; Toro MA
    Genet Res; 2000 Jun; 75(3):331-43. PubMed ID: 10893869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. SAMPLING PROPERTIES OF GENEALOGICAL PATHWAYS UNDERLYING POPULATION PEDIGREES.
    Wollenberg K; Avise JC
    Evolution; 1998 Aug; 52(4):957-966. PubMed ID: 28565230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 12755885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Metafounders are related to F
    Garcia-Baccino CA; Legarra A; Christensen OF; Misztal I; Pocrnic I; Vitezica ZG; Cantet RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):34. PubMed ID: 28283016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimating F-statistics.
    Weir BS; Hill WG
    Annu Rev Genet; 2002; 36():721-50. PubMed ID: 12359738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effects of selective breeding against scrapie susceptibility on the genetic variability of the Latxa Black-Faced sheep breed.
    Alfonso L; Parada A; Legarra A; Ugarte E; Arana A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2006; 38(5):495-511. PubMed ID: 16954042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators.
    Van de Casteele T; Galbusera P; Matthysen E
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Jun; 10(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 11412374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genealogical Analysis of a Closed Herd of Black Hairless Iberian Pigs.
    Toro MA; Rodrigañez J; Silio L; Rodriguez C
    Conserv Biol; 2000 Dec; 14(6):1843-1851. PubMed ID: 35701909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Personalized genealogical history of UK individuals inferred from biobank-scale IBD segments.
    Naseri A; Tang K; Geng X; Shi J; Zhang J; Shakya P; Liu X; Zhang S; Zhi D
    BMC Biol; 2021 Feb; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 33593342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize.
    Bernardo R
    Theor Appl Genet; 1993 Feb; 85(8):1055-62. PubMed ID: 24196158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Detecting linkage between a trait and a marker in a random mating population without pedigree record.
    Mano S; Endo TA; Oka A; Ozawa A; Gojobori T; Inoko H
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(3):e4956. PubMed ID: 19308260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimating Relatedness in the Presence of Null Alleles.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Dunn DW; Qi X; Guo S; Li B
    Genetics; 2016 Jan; 202(1):247-60. PubMed ID: 26500259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Genotyping-by-sequencing for estimating relatedness in nonmodel organisms: Avoiding the trap of precise bias.
    Attard CRM; Beheregaray LB; Möller LM
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):381-390. PubMed ID: 29160928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficient and accurate computation of base generation allele frequencies.
    Aldridge MN; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Feb; 102(2):1364-1373. PubMed ID: 30471906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. MIM: an indirect method to assess inbreeding and coancestry in large incomplete pedigrees of selected dairy cattle.
    Colleau JJ; Sargolzaei M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Jun; 128(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 21554410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.