126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21750215)
1. Using the RUG-III classification system for understanding the resource intensity of persons with intellectual disability residing in nursing homes.
Martin L; Fries BE; Hirdes JP; James M
J Intellect Disabil; 2011 Jun; 15(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 21750215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applying Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Hong Kong nursing homes.
Chou KL; Chi I; Leung JC
Can J Aging; 2008; 27(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 19158040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) system as a staffing tool in nursing homes.
Dellefield ME
Geriatr Nurs; 2006; 27(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16757387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of residents in nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) using Resource Utilization Groups Version III (RUG-III).
Francesconi P; Cantini E; Bavazzano E; Lauretani F; Bandinelli S; Buiatti E; Ferrucci L
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2006 Apr; 18(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 16702782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III).
Fries BE; Schneider DP; Foley WJ; Gavazzi M; Burke R; Cornelius E
Med Care; 1994 Jul; 32(7):668-85. PubMed ID: 8028403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of registered nursing care of residents in English nursing homes using the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) and Resource Utilisation Groups version III (RUG-III).
Carpenter I; Perry M; Challis D; Hope K
Age Ageing; 2003 May; 32(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12720613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental dysfunction and resource use in nursing homes.
Fries BE; Mehr DR; Schneider D; Foley WJ; Burke R
Med Care; 1993 Oct; 31(10):898-920. PubMed ID: 8412392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The resource utilization group system: its effect on nursing home case mix and costs.
Thorpe KE; Gertler PJ; Goldman P
Inquiry; 1991; 28(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 1761308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The RUG-III case mix classification system for long-term care nursing facilities: is it adequate for nurse staffing?
Mueller C
J Nurs Adm; 2000 Nov; 30(11):535-43. PubMed ID: 11098253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities.
Björkgren MA; Häkkinen U; Finne-Soveri UH; Fries BE
Scand J Public Health; 1999 Sep; 27(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 10482083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Care needs of residents in community-based long-term care facilities in Taiwan.
Li IC; Yin TJ
J Clin Nurs; 2005 Jul; 14(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 15946279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of Resource Utilization Groups version III for Home Care (RUG-III/HC): evidence from a Canadian home care jurisdiction.
Poss JW; Hirdes JP; Fries BE; McKillop I; Chase M
Med Care; 2008 Apr; 46(4):380-7. PubMed ID: 18362817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Explaining direct care resource use of nursing home residents: findings from time studies in four states.
Arling G; Kane RL; Mueller C; Lewis T
Health Serv Res; 2007 Apr; 42(2):827-46. PubMed ID: 17362220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Case-mix classification in post-acute and long-term care. Validation of Resource Utilization Groups III (RUG-III) in the Czech Republic].
Topinková E; Neuwirth J; Mellanová A; Stanková M; Haas T
Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Feb; 139(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 10802930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nursing home case-mix instruments: validation of the RUG-III system in Italy.
Brizioli E; Bernabei R; Grechi F; Masera F; Landi F; Bandinelli S; Cavazzini C; Gangemi S; Ferrucci L
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2003 Jun; 15(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14582687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RUG-III and resource allocation: comparing the relationship of direct care time with patient characteristics in five countries.
Carpenter GI; Ikegami N; Ljunggren G; Carrillo E; Fries BE
Age Ageing; 1997 Sep; 26 Suppl 2():61-5. PubMed ID: 9464557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [On the feasibility of a RUG-III based payment system for long-term care facilities in Korea].
Kim EK; Park HY; Kim CY
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2004 Apr; 34(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 15314323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A case-mix classification system for long-term care facilities.
Zbylot S; Job C; Mccormick E; Boulter C; Moore A
Nurs Manage; 1995 Apr; 26(4):49-50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 7731600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. RUG-III for exploring the association between staffing levels and cost-efficiency in nursing facility care in Finland.
Laine J
Health Care Manage Rev; 2006; 31(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 16493275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.
Holmes JS
Health Serv Res; 1996 Aug; 31(3):327-46. PubMed ID: 8698588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
