These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21750388)

  • 1. Inconsistency between different measures of sexual selection.
    Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
    Am Nat; 2011 Aug; 178(2):256-68. PubMed ID: 21750388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection.
    Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
    Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 18279355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geographical variation in the mating system of the dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae).
    Mobley KB; Jones AG
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(12):2596-606. PubMed ID: 17561916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection.
    Jones AG
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1673-84. PubMed ID: 19228185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In hot pursuit: fluctuating mating system and sexual selection in sand lizards.
    Olsson M; Wapstra E; Schwartz T; Madsen T; Ujvari B; Uller T
    Evolution; 2011 Feb; 65(2):574-83. PubMed ID: 21044055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic versus census estimators of the opportunity for sexual selection in the wild.
    Dunn SJ; Waits LP; Byers JA
    Am Nat; 2012 Apr; 179(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 22437175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genic capture, sex linkage, and the heritability of fitness.
    Connallon T
    Am Nat; 2010 May; 175(5):564-76. PubMed ID: 20331359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex ratio and density affect sexual selection in a sex-role reversed fish.
    Aronsen T; Berglund A; Mobley KB; Ratikainen II; Rosenqvist G
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3243-57. PubMed ID: 24152006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex color patterns in dragon lizards.
    Chen IP; Stuart-Fox D; Hugall AF; Symonds MR
    Evolution; 2012 Nov; 66(11):3605-14. PubMed ID: 23106722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection is positively associated with ecological generalism among agamid lizards.
    Ostman O; Stuart-Fox D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Apr; 24(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21261768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postcopulatory fertilization bias as a form of cryptic sexual selection.
    Calsbeek R; Bonneaud C
    Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1137-48. PubMed ID: 18298641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The mismeasurement of sexual selection.
    Klug H; Heuschele J; Jennions MD; Kokko H
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Mar; 23(3):447-62. PubMed ID: 20088870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homage to Bateman: sex roles predict sex differences in sexual selection.
    Fritzsche K; Arnqvis G
    Evolution; 2013 Jul; 67(7):1926-36. PubMed ID: 23815650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis.
    Corl A; Davis AR; Kuchta SR; Comendant T; Sinervo B
    Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 19659598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio.
    Jones AG; Arguello JR; Arnold SJ
    Am Nat; 2004 Oct; 164(4):444-56. PubMed ID: 15459877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: an extended approach to quantify sexual selection.
    Anthes N; David P; Auld JR; Hoffer JN; Jarne P; Koene JM; Kokko H; Lorenzi MC; Pélissié B; Sprenger D; Staikou A; Schärer L
    Am Nat; 2010 Sep; 176(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 20636132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcement in chorus frogs: lifetime fitness estimates including intrinsic natural selection and sexual selection against hybrids.
    Lemmon EM; Lemmon AR
    Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1748-61. PubMed ID: 20100218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter.
    Klug H; Lindström K; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Sep; 13(9):1094-102. PubMed ID: 20545730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex-specific selection and intraspecific variation in sexual size dimorphism.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Evolution; 2010 Mar; 64(3):798-809. PubMed ID: 19796147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.