These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21750717)

  • 1. Bayesian cue integration as a developmental outcome of reward mediated learning.
    Weisswange TH; Rothkopf CA; Rodemann T; Triesch J
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e21575. PubMed ID: 21750717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian Theory of Sequential Causal Learning and Abstract Transfer.
    Lu H; Rojas RR; Beckers T; Yuille AL
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Mar; 40(2):404-39. PubMed ID: 25902728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward prediction errors, not sensory prediction errors, play a major role in model selection in human reinforcement learning.
    Wu Y; Morita M; Izawa J
    Neural Netw; 2022 Oct; 154():109-121. PubMed ID: 35872516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reward maximization justifies the transition from sensory selection at childhood to sensory integration at adulthood.
    Daee P; Mirian MS; Ahmadabadi MN
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103143. PubMed ID: 25058591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novelty and Inductive Generalization in Human Reinforcement Learning.
    Gershman SJ; Niv Y
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):391-415. PubMed ID: 25808176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Erotic cue exposure increases physiological arousal, biases choices toward immediate rewards, and attenuates model-based reinforcement learning.
    Mathar D; Wiebe A; Tuzsus D; Knauth K; Peters J
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Dec; 60(12):e14381. PubMed ID: 37435973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopamine errors drive excitatory and inhibitory components of backward conditioning in an outcome-specific manner.
    Seitz BM; Hoang IB; DiFazio LE; Blaisdell AP; Sharpe MJ
    Curr Biol; 2022 Jul; 32(14):3210-3218.e3. PubMed ID: 35752165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant.
    Knill DC
    J Vis; 2007 May; 7(7):5.1-24. PubMed ID: 17685801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal Inference About Good and Bad Outcomes.
    Dorfman HM; Bhui R; Hughes BL; Gershman SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Apr; 30(4):516-525. PubMed ID: 30759048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning multisensory cue integration: A computational model of crossmodal synaptic plasticity enables reliability-based cue weighting by capturing stimulus statistics.
    Shaikh D
    Front Neural Circuits; 2022; 16():921453. PubMed ID: 36004009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth.
    Jacobs RA; Fine I
    Vision Res; 1999 Dec; 39(24):4062-75. PubMed ID: 10748939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intact Reinforcement Learning But Impaired Attentional Control During Multidimensional Probabilistic Learning in Older Adults.
    Daniel R; Radulescu A; Niv Y
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 31826943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian comparison of explicit and implicit causal inference strategies in multisensory heading perception.
    Acerbi L; Dokka K; Angelaki DE; Ma WJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 14(7):e1006110. PubMed ID: 30052625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CACNA1C gene regulates behavioral strategies in operant rule learning.
    Koppe G; Mallien AS; Berger S; Bartsch D; Gass P; Vollmayr B; Durstewitz D
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):e2000936. PubMed ID: 28604818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AMPA-receptor GluR1 subunits are involved in the control over behavior by cocaine-paired cues.
    Mead AN; Zamanillo D; Becker N; Stephens DN
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2007 Feb; 32(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 16495937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reframing appetitive reinforcement learning and reward valuation as effects mediated by hippocampal-dependent behavioral inhibition.
    Jones S; Hyde A; Davidson TL
    Nutr Res; 2020 Jul; 79():1-12. PubMed ID: 32544728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian reinforcement learning: A basic overview.
    Kang P; Tobler PN; Dayan P
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2024 May; 211():107924. PubMed ID: 38579896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Striatal dopamine signals reflect perceived cue-action-outcome associations in mice.
    Bernklau TW; Righetti B; Mehrke LS; Jacob SN
    Nat Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 27(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 38291283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social Bayes: Using Bayesian Modeling to Study Autistic Trait-Related Differences in Social Cognition.
    Sevgi M; Diaconescu AO; Henco L; Tittgemeyer M; Schilbach L
    Biol Psychiatry; 2020 Jan; 87(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 31856957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How instructed knowledge modulates the neural systems of reward learning.
    Li J; Delgado MR; Phelps EA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jan; 108(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 21173266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.