BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21752033)

  • 1. Effect of post length and diameter on remaining dentine thickness in maxillary central and lateral incisors.
    Alomari QD; Barrieshi KM; Al-Awadhi SA
    Int Endod J; 2011 Oct; 44(10):956-66. PubMed ID: 21752033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of accessory canals in Japanese anterior maxillary teeth following root canal filling ex vivo.
    Adorno CG; Yoshioka T; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 20518929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
    Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of post preparation on the residual dentin thickness of maxillary molars.
    Souza EM; do Nascimento LM; Maia Filho EM; Alves CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 21889005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills.
    Pilo R; Shapenco E; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18395536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micro-CT analyses of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity.
    Markvart M; Darvann TA; Larsen P; Dalstra M; Kreiborg S; Bjørndal L
    Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 22044111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parallel post-space preparation in different tooth types ex vivo: deviation from the canal centre and remaining dentine thickness.
    Huysmans MC; Klein MH; Kok GF; Whitworth JM
    Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):778-85. PubMed ID: 17697109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
    Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
    J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining the apical preparation size in premolars: part III.
    Hecker H; Bartha T; Löst C; Weiger R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20610301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A combined radiographic and computerized scanning method to evaluate remaining dentine thickness in mandibular incisors after various intracanal procedures.
    Katz A; Tamse A
    Int Endod J; 2003 Oct; 36(10):682-6. PubMed ID: 14511225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars.
    Krishan R; Paqué F; Ossareh A; Kishen A; Dao T; Friedman S
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25069925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root canal preparation with a novel nickel-titanium instrument evaluated with micro-computed tomography: canal surface preparation over time.
    Peters OA; Boessler C; Paqué F
    J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1068-72. PubMed ID: 20478468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills.
    Pilo R; Tamse A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 10842127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the instrumentation technique and apical preparation diameter on calcium hydroxide filling in simulated curved canals.
    Vier-Pelisser FV; Meng A; Benedete Netto LC; Só MV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 23649064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cleaning and shaping the apical third of a root canal system.
    Yu DC; Schilder H
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 12004725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness?
    Gu XH; Mao CY; Liang C; Wang HM; Kern M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Oct; 117(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 19758258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of calcium hydroxide and endodontic irrigants on fibre post bond strength to root canal dentine.
    Renovato SR; Santana FR; Ferreira JM; Souza JB; Soares CJ; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2013 Aug; 46(8):738-46. PubMed ID: 23551247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
    Solomon CS; Osman YI
    SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.