These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21752081)

  • 1. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments.
    Mackillop L; Parker-Swift J; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 21752081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom.
    Wilkinson JR; Crossley JG; Wragg A; Mills P; Cowan G; Wade W
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18338989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.
    Hassell A; Bullock A; Whitehouse A; Wood L; Jones P; Wall D
    Postgrad Med J; 2012 Jan; 88(1035):10-4. PubMed ID: 22052883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
    Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal.
    Shepherd A; Lough M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):149-64. PubMed ID: 20515544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of a trustworthy multisource feedback instrument to support nurse appraisals.
    Crossley JG
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2015; 35(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 26115108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all?
    Mackillop LH; Crossley J; Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Wade W; Armitage M
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(2):e75-83. PubMed ID: 21275537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Govaerts MJ; Verhoeven BH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.
    Overeem K; Wollersheim HC; Arah OA; Cruijsberg JK; Grol RP; Lombarts KM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Mar; 12():80. PubMed ID: 22448816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate medical education and training: a national evaluation in general practice in the United Kingdom.
    Murphy DJ; Bruce DA; Mercer SW; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 May; 14(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 18306052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.
    Lee KL; Tsai SL; Chiu YT; Ho MJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 May; 21(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 26387118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training.
    Davies H; Archer J; Bateman A; Dewar S; Crossley J; Grant J; Southgate L
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1014-20. PubMed ID: 18823521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
    Lockyer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 May; 95(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 20457700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.
    Elwyn G; Lewis M; Evans R; Hutchings H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Sep; 55(518):690-5. PubMed ID: 16176736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Postgrad Med J; 2010 Sep; 86(1019):526-31. PubMed ID: 20841329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a multi-source feedback tool for use in general practice.
    Campbell J; Narayanan A; Burford B; Greco M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 20515545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.