These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21752231)

  • 41. [Utility and limitations of speech audiometry testing in the detection of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting].
    Babin E; Bequignon A; Goullet de Rugy M; Edy E; Moreau S; Izard JP; Valdazo A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 12723484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A modern approach to noise induced hearing loss in military operations.
    Brown DC; Milner RS
    J R Nav Med Serv; 2010; 96(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 20608008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Understanding and preventing noise-induced hearing loss.
    Hong O; Kerr MJ; Poling GL; Dhar S
    Dis Mon; 2013 Apr; 59(4):110-8. PubMed ID: 23507351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of muzzle suppression and ear-level hearing protection in firearm use.
    Branch MP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jun; 144(6):950-3. PubMed ID: 21493334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Prevention of occupational hearing loss].
    Ostapkovich VE; Suvorov GA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1983; (5):5-8. PubMed ID: 6636439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of improved hearing protection regulations in the prevention of military noise-induced hearing loss.
    Mrena R; Ylikoski J; Kiukaanniemi H; Mäkitie AA; Savolainen S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 128(9):997-1003. PubMed ID: 19086196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Hearing tests at a working place. Practical and theoretical deliberations illustrated by a concrete example].
    Matzen LE; May O
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1982 Oct; 144(40):2968-71. PubMed ID: 7179569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Hearing conservation and occupational exposure to noise.
    Guidotti TL; Novak RE
    Am Fam Physician; 1983 Oct; 28(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 6637731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [A computerized system for the protection of the hearing of workers exposed to noise].
    Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Sułkowski W; Jurewicz B; Chrześcijanek M
    Med Pr; 1992; 43(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 1453943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Audiometric evaluation of noise induced hearing loss.
    Ruth RA
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):639-54. PubMed ID: 471510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Is the Army Hearing Conservation Programme working in the Territorial Army?
    Callow CG
    J R Army Med Corps; 1988 Feb; 134(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 3351791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [The use of an automatic device for recording the recovery time from auditory fatigue in flight personnel exposed to noise].
    Ceresia G; Cesareo G; De Benedetto M; Pianura CM
    Minerva Med; 1983 Jan; 74(3-4):113-5. PubMed ID: 6828243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Editorial: Auditory injury - A military perspective.
    Yankaskas K; Hammill T; Packer M; Zuo J
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():1-3. PubMed ID: 28526261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Differential diagnosis of occupational hearing loss.
    Sataloff RT; Sataloff J
    Occup Health Saf; 2001 Sep; 70(9):126-9. PubMed ID: 11582684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Can hearing tests prevent hearing loss in the occupational environment?].
    Korsgaard B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Apr; 155(16):1219-20. PubMed ID: 8497959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Value of audiometry.
    J Soc Occup Med; 1973 Apr; 23(2):68-9. PubMed ID: 4283720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measurement of hearing loss in occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lafon JC
    Audiology; 1981; 20(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 7213204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Navy Hearing Conservation Program: 1995-1999 retrospective analysis of threshold shifts for age, sex, and officer/enlisted status.
    Bohnker BK; Page JC; Rovig GW; Betts LS; Sack DM
    Mil Med; 2004 Jan; 169(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 14964507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Documentation: the weak link in audiometric monitoring programs.
    Gasaway DC
    Occup Health Saf; 1985 Jan; 54(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 3982760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.