BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21753770)

  • 1. Calibration mode influences central blood pressure differences between SphygmoCor and two newer devices, the Arteriograph and Omron HEM-9000.
    Rezai MR; Goudot G; Winters C; Finn JD; Wu FC; Cruickshank JK
    Hypertens Res; 2011 Sep; 34(9):1046-51. PubMed ID: 21753770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of noninvasive assessments of central blood pressure using general transfer function and late systolic shoulder of the radial pressure wave.
    Wohlfahrt P; Krajcoviechová A; Seidlerová J; Mayer O; Filipovsky J; Cífková R
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23999585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of central aortic systolic pressure using late systolic inflection of radial artery pulse and its application to vasodilator therapy.
    Takazawa K; Kobayashi H; Kojima I; Aizawa A; Kinoh M; Sugo Y; Shimizu M; Miyawaki Y; Tanaka N; Yamashina A; Avolio A
    J Hypertens; 2012 May; 30(5):908-16. PubMed ID: 22469836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of central systolic blood pressure by pulse volume plethysmography with a noninvasive blood pressure monitor.
    Sung SH; Cheng HM; Chuang SY; Shih YT; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Yu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 May; 25(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 22278210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
    Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of central pressure estimates obtained from SphygmoCor, Omron HEM-9000AI and carotid applanation tonometry.
    Kips JG; Schutte AE; Vermeersch SJ; Huisman HW; Van Rooyen JM; Glyn MC; Fourie CM; Malan L; Schutte R; Van Bortel LM; Segers P
    J Hypertens; 2011 Jun; 29(6):1115-20. PubMed ID: 21505351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Central Blood Pressure Estimated by a Cuff-Based Device With Radial Tonometry.
    Peng X; Schultz MG; Abhayaratna WP; Stowasser M; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1173-8. PubMed ID: 27317573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure.
    Pucci G; Cheriyan J; Hubsch A; Hickson SS; Gajendragadkar PR; Watson T; O'Sullivan M; Woodcock-Smith J; Schillaci G; Wilkinson IB; McEniery CM
    J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23079681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of central aortic blood pressures measured non-invasively using radial artery applanation tonometry and peripheral pulse wave analysis.
    Crilly M; Coch C; Bruce M; Clark H; Williams D
    Blood Press; 2007; 16(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 17852086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: a study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification.
    Smulyan H; Mukherjee R; Sheehe PR; Safar ME
    Am Heart J; 2010 Mar; 159(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 20211301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of the calibration error in the transfer function-derived central aortic blood pressures.
    Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21850061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
    Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Pressure wave shape comparison between two non-invasive tonometric devices].
    Agnoletti D; Millasseau S; Topouchian J; Zhang Y; Safar ME; Blacher J
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2013 Jun; 62(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 23721987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating central SBP from the peripheral pulse: influence of waveform analysis and calibration error.
    Guilcher A; Brett S; Munir S; Clapp B; Chowienczyk PJ
    J Hypertens; 2011 Jul; 29(7):1357-66. PubMed ID: 21558956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
    Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of non-invasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer-function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics.
    Hope SA; Meredith IT; Cameron JD
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2004 Aug; 107(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15139848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of central blood pressure by a noninvasive method (brachial blood pressure and QKD interval): a noninvasive validation.
    Cremer A; Codjo L; Butlin M; Papaioannou G; Yeim S; Jan E; Kiat H; Avolio A; Gosse P
    J Hypertens; 2013 Sep; 31(9):1847-52. PubMed ID: 24036902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Li Y; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Wang JG
    J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23188416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central aortic blood pressure from ultrasound wall-tracking of the carotid artery in children: comparison with invasive measurements and radial tonometry.
    Milne L; Keehn L; Guilcher A; Reidy JF; Karunanithy N; Rosenthal E; Qureshi S; Chowienczyk PJ; Sinha MD
    Hypertension; 2015 May; 65(5):1141-6. PubMed ID: 25824246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.