These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21755419)

  • 1. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2289-300. PubMed ID: 21970615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 20096395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anticipation of visual form independent of knowing where the form will occur.
    Bruhn P; Bundesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):930-41. PubMed ID: 22528609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18804193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal expectation and information processing: a model-based analysis.
    Jepma M; Wagenmakers EJ; Nieuwenhuis S
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 22197060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How much attention does an event file need?
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1067-82. PubMed ID: 16262499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time.
    Correa A; Nobre AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 18632896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination.
    Grondin S; Rammsayer T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 May; 56(4):731-65. PubMed ID: 12745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do endogenous and exogenous action control compete for perception?
    Pfister R; Heinemann A; Kiesel A; Thomaschke R; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 22201462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effective time course of preparation.
    Los SA; Schut ML
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Aug; 57(1):20-55. PubMed ID: 18255052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lengthening fixed preparatory foreperiod durations within a digit magnitude classification task serves mainly to shift distributions of response times upwards.
    Leth-Steensen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19041084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Only time will tell the future: Anticipatory saccades reveal the temporal dynamics of time-based location and task expectancy.
    Pfeuffer CU; Aufschnaiter S; Thomaschke R; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1183-1200. PubMed ID: 32614216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rhythms that speed you up.
    Sanabria D; Capizzi M; Correa A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):236-44. PubMed ID: 20718571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.