These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21755518)

  • 1. Incidence of placental mosaicism leading to discrepant results between QF-PCR and karyotyping in 22,825 chorionic villus samples.
    Holgado E; Liddle S; Ballard T; Levett L
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1029-38. PubMed ID: 21755518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Incidence of discrepant results between QF-PCR and karyotype testing in chorion villus samples: UK experience.
    Hamilton S; Waters JJ
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 May; 32(5):503; author reply 504-5. PubMed ID: 22570235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common trisomies: discordant results between QF-PCR analysis and karyotype analysis on long-term culture for a case of trisomy 18 detected in CVS.
    Allen SK; Luharia A; Gould CP; MacDonald F; Larkins S; Davison EV
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Dec; 26(12):1160-7. PubMed ID: 17063531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS.
    Waters JJ; Mann K; Grimsley L; Ogilvie CM; Donaghue C; Staples L; Hills A; Adams T; Wilson C
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Apr; 27(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 17286305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrepancies between direct QF-PCR of chorionic villi and karyotype analysis of chorionic mesenchyme cells.
    Ogilvie C; Mann K
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 May; 32(5):501-2; author reply 504-5. PubMed ID: 22570234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing discrepant findings between QF-PCR on uncultured prenatal samples and karyotyping on long-term culture.
    Lau ET; Tang L; Wong C; Yung Hang L; Ghosh A; Leung WC; Sin WK; Lau TK; Kung YY; Tang MH
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Feb; 29(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 19180578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complete discrepancy between abnormal fetal karyotypes predicted by QF-PCR rapid testing and karyotyped cultured cells in a first-trimester CVS.
    Waters JJ; Walsh S; Levett LJ; Liddle S; Akinfenwa Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):892-7. PubMed ID: 16906600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis.
    Donaghue C; Mann K; Docherty Z; Ogilvie CM
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15662691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping.
    Stojilkovic-Mikic T; Mann K; Docherty Z; Mackie Ogilvie C
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15662689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. QF-PCR as a substitute for karyotyping of cytotrophoblast for the analysis of chorionic villi: advantages and limitations from a cytogenetic retrospective audit of 44,727 first-trimester prenatal diagnoses.
    Grati FR; Malvestiti F; Grimi B; Gaetani E; Di Meco AM; Trotta A; Liuti R; Chinetti S; Dulcetti F; Ruggeri AM; Agrati C; Frascoli G; Milani S; De Toffol S; Martinoni L; Paganini S; Marcato L; Maggi F; Simoni G
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 May; 33(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 23606546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel method for extracting DNA from chorionic villus samples for use in CVS-PCR, which ensures complete villus dissociation.
    Holgado E; Holgado B; Liddle S; Ballard T; Levett L
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Feb; 29(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 19090544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual testing with QF-PCR and karyotype analysis for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Evaluation of 13,500 cases with consideration of using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test according to referral indications.
    Papoulidis I; Siomou E; Sotiriadis A; Efstathiou G; Psara A; Sevastopoulou E; Anastasakis E; Sifakis S; Tsiligianni T; Kontodiou M; Malamaki C; Tzimina M; Petersen MB; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Jul; 32(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22513450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Implementation of arrays in first trimester prenatal diagnosis].
    Trková M; Putzová M; Bečvářová V; Horáček J; Soldátová I; Krautová L; Sekowská M; Hodačová J; Hnyková L; Hlavová E; Smetanová D; Stejskal D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Jun; 80(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 26087211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent PCR with non-polymorphic loci in prenatal diagnosis].
    Zhu XY; Hu YL; Wang YP; Zhu HY; Li J; Zhu RF; Zhang Y; Wu X; Yang Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 43(11):818-23. PubMed ID: 19087563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased nuchal translucency, hydrops fetalis or hygroma colli. A new test strategy for early fetal aneuploidy detection.
    Jenderny J; Schmidt W; Hecher K; Hackelöer BJ; Kerber S; Kochhan L; Held KR
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2001; 16(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 11399881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of mosaicism by prenatal BoBs™.
    Cheng YK; Wong C; Wong HK; Leung KO; Kwok YK; Suen A; Wang CC; Leung TY; Choy KW
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Jan; 33(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 23168997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Completely discrepant results between prenatal QF-PCR rapid aneuploidy testing and cultured cell karyotyping obtained from CVS: lessons from UK audit and re-audit of 22,221 cases.
    Hamilton SJ; Waters JJ
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Sep; 32(9):909-11. PubMed ID: 22674778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of a chromosomally mosaic placenta to assess the cell populations in dissociated chorionic villi: implications for QF-PCR aneuploidy testing.
    Mann K; Kabba M; Donaghue C; Hills A; Ogilvie CM
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Mar; 27(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 17323406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrospective and theoretical evaluation of rapid methods for detecting chromosome abnormalities and their implications on genetic counseling based on a series of 3868 CVS diagnoses.
    Soler A; Morales C; Badenas C; Rodríguez-Revenga L; Carrió A; Margarit E; Costa D; Borrell A; Goncé A; Milà M; Sánchez A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 23(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 18046070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis.
    Filges I; Kang A; Klug V; Wenzel F; Heinimann K; Tercanli S; Miny P
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 May; 31(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 21351283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.