These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21756189)

  • 1. Age-related effects in inter-trial inhibition of attention.
    Wan X; Voss M; Lleras A
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2011 Sep; 18(5):562-76. PubMed ID: 21756189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related differences in the distractor previewing effect with schematic faces of emotions.
    Wan X; Tian L; Lleras A
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2014; 21(4):386-410. PubMed ID: 23957762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential inter-trial effects in the visual search of children, adolescents, and young adults.
    An J; Wen W; Wu Z; Wan X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():171-178. PubMed ID: 30286429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitation and inhibition effects in visual selective attention processes of individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Cha KH; Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 8192905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age and the ability to inhibit distractor information in visual selective attention.
    Kotary L; Hoyer WJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 7628509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intertrial inhibition of focused attention in pop-out search.
    Lleras A; Kawahara J; Wan XI; Ariga A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):114-31. PubMed ID: 18306966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues.
    Gottlob LR
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of selective inhibitory control: the influence of verbal labeling.
    Kray J; Kipp KH; Karbach J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19084817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging and involuntary attention capture: electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age.
    Lien MC; Gemperle A; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 20973601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological revelations of trial history effects in a color oddball search task.
    Shin E; Chong SC
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1878-1888. PubMed ID: 27699796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task.
    Fitzgeorge L; Buckolz E; Khan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1435-52. PubMed ID: 21479723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention.
    McCrae CS; Abrams RA
    Psychol Aging; 2001 Sep; 16(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 11554522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential age effects on attention-based inhibition: inhibitory tagging and inhibition of return.
    Langley LK; Vivas AB; Fuentes LJ; Bagne AG
    Psychol Aging; 2005 Jun; 20(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 16029098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age differences in what is viewed and remembered in complex conjunction search.
    Williams CC; Zacks RT; Henderson JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):946-66. PubMed ID: 18932061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Older adults capitalize on contextual information to guide search.
    Neider MB; Kramer AF
    Exp Aging Res; 2011 Oct; 37(5):539-71. PubMed ID: 22091581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.