BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21756454)

  • 1. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Music and lexical tone perception in Chinese adult cochlear implant users.
    Wang S; Liu B; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Chen X; Han D; Zhang L
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 22362607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A study on the normal values of musical sounds in cochlear implants test battery].
    Dong R; Wang S; Zhou Y; Qi B; Chen X; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 27(13):712-6. PubMed ID: 24073580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test.
    Brockmeier SJ; Peterreins M; Lorens A; Vermeire K; Helbig S; Anderson I; Skarzynski H; Van de Heyning P; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():70-80. PubMed ID: 19955723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The music perception abilities of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.
    Stabej KK; Smid L; Gros A; Zargi M; Kosir A; Vatovec J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 76(10):1392-400. PubMed ID: 22835930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From TEMPO+ to OPUS 2: what can music tests tell us about processor upgrades?
    van Besouw RM; Grasmeder ML
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S40-3. PubMed ID: 21917218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Wright R; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
    Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.