These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21756585)

  • 1. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():67-74. PubMed ID: 21756585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation in adults with monaural sound-deprivation and unilateral hearing aid.
    Boisvert I; Lyxell B; Mäki-Torkko E; McMahon CM; Dowell RC
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):572-9. PubMed ID: 22588234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Unilateral or Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Assessment, Device Fitting, and Habilitation.
    Greaver L; Eskridge H; Teagle HFB
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 26(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 28291986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Speech Performance in Bimodal versus Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Sturm JJ; Kuhlmey M; Alexiades G; Hoffman R; Kim AH
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Apr; 131(4):E1322-E1327. PubMed ID: 32876332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids.
    Looi V; Radford CJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 21300411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C; Kaider A; Hamzavi J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative importance of monaural sound deprivation and bilateral significant hearing loss in predicting cochlear implantation outcomes.
    Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Tremblay G; Lyxell B
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 21750463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of fine structure and extended low frequencies in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Katzinger M; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 21324531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hybrid cochlear implantation: quality of life, quality of hearing, and working performance compared to patients with conventional unilateral or bilateral cochlear implantation.
    Härkönen K; Kivekäs I; Kotti V; Sivonen V; Vasama JP
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 274(10):3599-3604. PubMed ID: 28762045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-utility analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a health economic assessment from the perspective of a publicly funded program.
    Chen JM; Amoodi H; Mittmann N
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24431194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of SRA Nucleus Freedom CI in population of children with functional residual hearing.
    Skarżyński H; Matusiak M; Furmanek M; Skarżyński PH
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S24-6. PubMed ID: 24869435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness for enhancement of sound localization and speech perception.
    Kamal SM; Robinson AD; Diaz RC
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct; 20(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 22886035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
    Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implants with fine structure processing improve speech and tone perception in Mandarin-speaking adults.
    Chen X; Liu B; Liu S; Mo L; Li Y; Kong Y; Zheng J; Li Y; Gong S; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 133(7):733-8. PubMed ID: 23768059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ESRT, ART, and MCL correlations in experienced paediatric cochlear implant users.
    Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Polak M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():482-4. PubMed ID: 21756678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefit and predictive factors for speech perception outcomes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Chang YS; Hong SH; Kim EY; Choi JE; Chung WH; Cho YS; Moon IJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(5):571-577. PubMed ID: 29859680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural history of contralateral residual hearing in unilateral cochlear implant users - long-term findings.
    Yehudai N; Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1073-6. PubMed ID: 22691155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: development of the primary auditory abilities of bilateral stimulation.
    Sparreboom M; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 20980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons of the pitch perception abilities of adults and children using cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Looi V
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S14-6. PubMed ID: 24869431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.