These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening. Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Munich Music Questionnaire: adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese and application in cochlear implant users. Frederigue-Lopes NB; Bevilacqua MC; Costa OA Codas; 2015; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 25885192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor. Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients. Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Vongpaisal T; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):1091-103. PubMed ID: 17077217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment. Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Limb CJ; Roy AT Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():13-26. PubMed ID: 23665130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The music perception abilities of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Stabej KK; Smid L; Gros A; Zargi M; Kosir A; Vatovec J Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 76(10):1392-400. PubMed ID: 22835930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying emotions in music through electrical hearing in deaf children using cochlear implants. Hopyan T; Gordon KA; Papsin BC Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 21756455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users. Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fitting of the hearing system affects partial deafness cochlear implant performance. Polak M; Lorens A; Helbig S; McDonald S; McDonald S; Vermeire K Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():117-21. PubMed ID: 21756595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]