These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21756661)

  • 1. European adult multi-centre HiRes® 120 study--an update on 65 subjects.
    Ambrosch P; Müller-Deile J; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Boermans PP; Frijns J; Boyle P; Kienast B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Cooper H; Fielden C; Eklöf M; Freijd A; Filipo R; Mancini P; Frachet B; Gallego S; Truy E; Helbig S; Jeffs E; Lombaard S; Meerton L; Marco J; Morant A; Meyer B; Pickerill M; Vanat Z; Sterkers O
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():406-11. PubMed ID: 21756661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary results of DUET to DUET 2 upgrade.
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Waskiewicz B; Lutek A; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():75-8. PubMed ID: 21756586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of the pitch perception abilities of adults and children using cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Looi V
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S14-6. PubMed ID: 24869431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of music perception in adult users of HiRes® 120 and previous generations of Advanced Bionics® sound coding strategies.
    Gazibegovic D; Arnold L; Rocca C; Boyle P
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():296-301. PubMed ID: 21756635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How much residual hearing is 'useful' for music perception with cochlear implants?
    El Fata F; James CJ; Laborde ML; Fraysse B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():14-21. PubMed ID: 19390171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitting of the hearing system affects partial deafness cochlear implant performance.
    Polak M; Lorens A; Helbig S; McDonald S; McDonald S; Vermeire K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():117-21. PubMed ID: 21756595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FS4 for partial deafness treatment.
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Polak M; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S78-80. PubMed ID: 24869452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the built-in TCoil of the behind-the-ear sound processor Harmony.
    Frohne-Buechner C; Brendel M; Saalfeld H; Buechner A; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():412-5. PubMed ID: 21756662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].
    Meister H; Tepeli D; Wagner P; Hess W; Walger M; von Wedel H; Lang-Roth R
    HNO; 2007 Apr; 55(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 17004071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary evidence of asymmetry in uncomfortable loudness levels after unilateral hearing aid experience: evidence of functional plasticity in the adult auditory system.
    Munro KJ; Trotter JH
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):684-8. PubMed ID: 17132556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical tone perception ability of profoundly hearing-impaired children: performance of cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Lee KY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1079-87. PubMed ID: 20634774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music perception in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of findings between HiRes90 and HiRes120.
    Filipo R; Ballantyne D; Mancini P; D'elia C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 18368569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():67-74. PubMed ID: 21756585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic stimulation treatments against tinnitus could be most effective when tinnitus pitch is within the stimulated frequency range.
    Schaette R; König O; Hornig D; Gross M; Kempter R
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):95-101. PubMed ID: 20619332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
    McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.