These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Influence of non-optimal levels of electrical stimulation in cochlear implantees on hearing benefits. Wasowski A; Lorens A; Obrycka A; Walkowiak A; Wozniak A; Skarzynski H; Palko T Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():485-8. PubMed ID: 21756679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception and subjective benefit in paediatric C40+ users after the upgrade to fine structure processing (FSP). Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():444-8. PubMed ID: 21756670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing auditory skills in children CI users: is phonemic discrimination related to acoustic variables only? Mancini P; Bosco E; D'Agosta L; Traisci G; Nicastri M; Giusti L; Musacchio A Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():332-5. PubMed ID: 21756643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of increasing the instantaneous input dynamic range in paediatric cochlear implant recipients. Veekmans K; Honeyman J; Daft M; Hawker K; Johnson S; Twomey T Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():473-8. PubMed ID: 21756676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of hearing and speech abilities in cochlear implant users in relation to cause of deafness. Janeschik S; Teschendorf M; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Bagus H Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():312-4. PubMed ID: 21756638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters? Van Den Abbeele T; Noël-Petroff N; Akin I; Caner G; Olgun L; Guiraud J; Truy E; Attias J; Raveh E; Belgin E; Sennaroglu G; Basta D; Ernst A; Martini A; Rosignoli M; Levi H; Elidan J; Benghalem A; Amstutz-Montadert I; Lerosey Y; De Vel E; Dhooge I; Hildesheimer M; Kronenberg J; Arnold L Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22340749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FS4 for partial deafness treatment. Lorens A; Zgoda M; Polak M; Skarzynski H Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S78-80. PubMed ID: 24869452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of low-frequency hearing in the acquisition of morphology. Coene M; Govaerts P; Rooryck J; Daemers K Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():272-7. PubMed ID: 21756630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception improvement in children with cochlear implant. Manouchehri N; Adel-Ghahraman M; Mobedshahi F; Motesadi-Zarandi M Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():336-9. PubMed ID: 21756644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship of intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds to maximum comfortable loudness levels of children with cochlear implants. Allum JH; Greisiger R; Probst R Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12212861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: round window and cochleostomy approaches. Karatas E; Aud MD; Baglam T; Durucu C; Baysal E; Kanlikama M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 21737149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Smoorenburg GF; Willeboer C; van Dijk JE Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):335-47. PubMed ID: 12401965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]