1182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21760512)
1. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
Baldwin M; Watkin P
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
Rahko-Laitila P; Karma P; Laippala P; Salmelin R; Sipilä M; Manninen M; Rahko T
Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones.
Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15064657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.
Lee J; Dhar S; Abel R; Banakis R; Grolley E; Lee J; Zecker S; Siegel J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 22436407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.
Frank T
Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 11324845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
Groh D; Pelanova J; Jilek M; Popelar J; Kabelka Z; Syka J
Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
Small SA; Hu N
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing.
Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Van den Bogaert T; Scherf F; Offeciers FE; Van de Heyning PH; Desloovere C; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; De Raeve L; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):178-90. PubMed ID: 19194296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]