These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21760631)

  • 1. The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition.
    Toombs RJ; Ducher G; Shepherd JA; De Souza MJ
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2012 Jan; 20(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 21760631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.
    Soriano JM; Ioannidou E; Wang J; Thornton JC; Horlick MN; Gallagher D; Heymsfield SB; Pierson RN
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 15319498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DXA: Technical aspects and application.
    Bazzocchi A; Ponti F; Albisinni U; Battista G; Guglielmi G
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1481-92. PubMed ID: 27157852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement between dual x-ray absorptiometers using pencil beam and fan beam: indicators of bone health and whole-body plus appendicular tissue composition in adult athletes.
    Tavares Ó; Duarte JP; Costa DC; Sousa-E-Silva P; Martinho D; Lus LGO; Duarte-Mendes P; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Casanova JM; Cyrino ES; Coelho-E-Silva MJ
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30133612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interchangeability of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in piglets and infants.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 78(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 12885703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change.
    Tylavsky FA; Lohman TG; Dockrell M; Lang T; Schoeller DA; Wan JY; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt M; Harris TB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Feb; 77(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12540394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens.
    Swennen Q; Janssens GP; Geers R; Decuypere E; Buyse J
    Poult Sci; 2004 Aug; 83(8):1348-57. PubMed ID: 15339010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
    Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision and accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of mice.
    Nagy TR; Clair AL
    Obes Res; 2000 Aug; 8(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 10968731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
    Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of differences between fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers.
    Mazess RB; Barden HS
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Oct; 67(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 11000342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Chemotherapy on Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Body Composition Precision Error in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
    Chang HC; Lin YC; Ng SH; Cheung YC; Wang CH; Chen FP; Chang HP; Sung CM; Fan CM; Yeh KY; Wu JS
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):437-443. PubMed ID: 30172603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of pencil-, fan-, and cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometers for evaluation of bone mineral content in excised rat bone.
    Libouban H; Simon Y; Silve C; Legrand E; Baslé MF; Audran M; Chappard D
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12665635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body composition by DXA: tried and true?
    Kohrt WM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Oct; 27(10):1349-53. PubMed ID: 8531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Agreement of Lateral Leg Muscle and Bone Composition Using Dual X-ray Absorptiometry.
    Raymond-Pope CJ; Bosch TA; Dengel DR
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(3):451-458. PubMed ID: 31133502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional body composition: cross-calibration of DXA scanners--QDR4500W and Discovery Wi.
    Covey MK; Berry JK; Hacker ED
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2010 Mar; 18(3):632-7. PubMed ID: 19960003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
    Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.