These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21760936)

  • 1. Estimation of mental effort in learning visual search by measuring pupil response.
    Takeuchi T; Puntous T; Tuladhar A; Yoshimoto S; Shirama A
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e21973. PubMed ID: 21760936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupil size as a measure of within-task learning.
    Foroughi CK; Sibley C; Coyne JT
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Oct; 54(10):1436-1443. PubMed ID: 28593652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil-Linked Arousal Responds to Unconscious Surprisal.
    Alamia A; VanRullen R; Pasqualotto E; Mouraux A; Zenon A
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(27):5369-5376. PubMed ID: 31061089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effort during visual search and counting: insights from pupillometry.
    Porter G; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):211-29. PubMed ID: 17455055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using task effort and pupil size to track covert shifts of visual attention independently of a pupillary light reflex.
    Brocher A; Harbecke R; Graf T; Memmert D; Hüttermann S
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2551-2567. PubMed ID: 29516414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual learning increases orientation sampling efficiency.
    Moerel D; Ling S; Jehee JF
    J Vis; 2016; 16(3):36. PubMed ID: 26913628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of context-dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks.
    Reavis EA; Frank SM; Greenlee MW; Tse PU
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jun; 37(6):2319-30. PubMed ID: 26970441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning progress mediates the link between cognitive effort and task engagement.
    Sayalı C; Heling E; Cools R
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105418. PubMed ID: 36871398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pupillary light response reflects encoding, but not maintenance, in visual working memory.
    Blom T; Mathôt S; Olivers CN; Van der Stigchel S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1716-1723. PubMed ID: 27428779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separable pupillary signatures of perception and action during perceptual multistability.
    Brascamp JW; de Hollander G; Wertheimer MD; DePew AN; Knapen T
    Elife; 2021 Aug; 10():. PubMed ID: 34378532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature reliability determines specificity and transfer of perceptual learning in orientation search.
    Yashar A; Denison RN
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 13(12):e1005882. PubMed ID: 29240813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pupil dilation reveals top-down attentional load during spatial monitoring.
    Lisi M; Bonato M; Zorzi M
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Dec; 112():39-45. PubMed ID: 26472280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-Time Strategy Video Game Experience and Visual Perceptual Learning.
    Kim YH; Kang DW; Kim D; Kim HJ; Sasaki Y; Watanabe T
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(29):10485-92. PubMed ID: 26203143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Costs of storing colour and complex shape in visual working memory: Insights from pupil size and slow waves.
    Kursawe MA; Zimmer HD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():67-77. PubMed ID: 25939139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory load predicts visual search efficiency: Evidence from a novel pupillary response paradigm.
    Attar N; Schneps MH; Pomplun M
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1038-49. PubMed ID: 27119363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A unified model for perceptual learning.
    Seitz A; Watanabe T
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Jul; 9(7):329-34. PubMed ID: 15955722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupil size tracks perceptual content and surprise.
    Kloosterman NA; Meindertsma T; van Loon AM; Lamme VA; Bonneh YS; Donner TH
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 41(8):1068-78. PubMed ID: 25754528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pupil size reflects the focus of feature-based attention.
    Binda P; Pereverzeva M; Murray SO
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 112(12):3046-52. PubMed ID: 25231615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing perceptual learning tasks: a review.
    Fine I; Jacobs RA
    J Vis; 2002; 2(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 12678592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cueing the Necker cube: Pupil dilation reflects the viewing-from-above constraint in bistable perception.
    Sato F; Laeng B; Nakauchi S; Minami T
    J Vis; 2020 Apr; 20(4):7. PubMed ID: 32293651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.