111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21761682)
1. Detecting and classifying linear structures in mammograms using random forests.
Berks M; Chen Z; Astley S; Taylor C
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2011; 22():510-24. PubMed ID: 21761682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Carvalho JD; Santiago SA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18232342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system.
Tanaka T; Nitta N; Ohta S; Kobayashi T; Kano A; Tsuchiya K; Murakami Y; Kitahara S; Wakamiya M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
Eur Radiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):2886-95. PubMed ID: 19585121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying effect-specific mammographic density.
Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Nielsen M
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):580-7. PubMed ID: 18044615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spiculation-preserving polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Daloia de Carvalho J; Anchieta Santiago S
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2791-4. PubMed ID: 17945740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linearization of mammograms using parameters derived from noise characteristics.
Karssemeijer N; Snoeren PR; Zhang W
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():258-69. PubMed ID: 17354701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography.
Muralidhar GS; Bovik AC; Giese JD; Sampat MP; Whitman GJ; Haygood TM; Stephens TW; Markey MK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80. PubMed ID: 20529728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of fractal analysis to mammography.
Raguso G; Ancona A; Chieppa L; L'abbate S; Pepe ML; Mangieri F; De Palo M; Rangayyan RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3182-5. PubMed ID: 21096599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammogram-based discriminant fusion analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.
Li JB; Wang YH; Tang LL
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 23153999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
