BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21761689)

  • 1. Functional brain imaging with M/EEG using structured sparsity in time-frequency dictionaries.
    Gramfort A; Strohmeier D; Haueisen J; Hamalainen M; Kowalski M
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2011; 22():600-11. PubMed ID: 21761689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A distributed spatio-temporal EEG/MEG inverse solver.
    Ou W; Golland P; Hämäläinen M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 1):26-34. PubMed ID: 18979728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations.
    Gramfort A; Strohmeier D; Haueisen J; Hämäläinen MS; Kowalski M
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():410-22. PubMed ID: 23291276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Algorithmic procedures for Bayesian MEG/EEG source reconstruction in SPM.
    López JD; Litvak V; Espinosa JJ; Friston K; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():476-87. PubMed ID: 24041874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography.
    Chang WT; Nummenmaa A; Hsieh JC; Lin FH
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 20488248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstructing spatially extended brain sources via enforcing multiple transform sparseness.
    Zhu M; Zhang W; Dickens DL; Ding L
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():280-93. PubMed ID: 24103850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symmetric BEM formulation for the M/EEG forward problem.
    Adde G; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Kybic J; Papadopoulo T
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():524-35. PubMed ID: 15344485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.
    Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():446-60. PubMed ID: 24161808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian Algorithm Based Localization of EEG Recorded Electromagnetic Brain Activity.
    Jatoi MA; Kamel N; Musavi SHA; López JD
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 31975664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Wipf D; Nagarajan S
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):947-66. PubMed ID: 18602278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI prior computation and parallel tempering algorithm: a probabilistic resolution of the MEG/EEG inverse problem.
    Bertrand C; Hamada Y; Kado H
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 11599533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.