These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21761689)

  • 21. Evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian method through retinotopic brain activities reconstruction from fMRI and MEG signals.
    Yoshioka T; Toyama K; Kawato M; Yamashita O; Nishina S; Yamagishi N; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1397-413. PubMed ID: 18620066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finding brain oscillations with power dependencies in neuroimaging data.
    Dähne S; Nikulin VV; Ramírez D; Schreier PJ; Müller KR; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():334-48. PubMed ID: 24721331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Iterative Reweighted Mixed-Norm Estimate for Spatio-Temporal MEG/EEG Source Reconstruction.
    Strohmeier D; Bekhti Y; Haueisen J; Gramfort A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2218-2228. PubMed ID: 27093548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.
    Babadi B; Obregon-Henao G; Lamus C; Hämäläinen MS; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():427-43. PubMed ID: 24055554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Matching pursuit and source deflation for sparse EEG/MEG dipole moment estimation.
    Wu SC; Swindlehurst AL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2280-8. PubMed ID: 23529074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning from M/EEG data with variable brain activation delays.
    Zaremba W; Kumar MP; Gramfort A; Blaschko MB
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2013; 23():414-25. PubMed ID: 24683987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance analysis of reduced-rank beamformers for estimating dipole source signals using EEG/MEG.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Dogandzić A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 16686406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data.
    Roś BP; Bijma F; de Gunst MC; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():305-15. PubMed ID: 26072253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatiotemporal localization of significant activation in MEG using permutation tests.
    Pantazis D; Nichols TE; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():512-23. PubMed ID: 15344484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A distributed spatio-temporal EEG/MEG inverse solver.
    Ou W; Hämäläinen MS; Golland P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):932-46. PubMed ID: 18603008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction.
    Haufe S; Nikulin VV; Ziehe A; Müller KR; Nolte G
    Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(2):726-38. PubMed ID: 18583157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multivariate reconstruction of functional networks from cortical sources dynamics in MEG/EEG.
    Dossevi A; Cosmelli D; Garnero L; Ammari H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Aug; 55(8):2074-86. PubMed ID: 18632370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Cottereau BR; Ales JM; Norcia AM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():64-73. PubMed ID: 25088693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
    Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A spatially-regularized dynamic source localization algorithm for EEG.
    Pirondini E; Babadi B; Lamus C; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6752-5. PubMed ID: 23367479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.