189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21762146)
21. Understanding variations in Medicare Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems scores: California as an example.
Farley DO; Elliott MN; Haviland AM; Slaughter ME; Heller A
Health Serv Res; 2011 Oct; 46(5):1646-62. PubMed ID: 21644970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Performance on Clinical Quality and Patient Experience Measures: Comparisons from Three Large States.
Timbie JW; Bogart A; Damberg CL; Elliott MN; Haas A; Gaillot SJ; Goldstein EH; Paddock SM
Health Serv Res; 2017 Dec; 52(6):2038-2060. PubMed ID: 29130269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Medicare Beneficiaries With a Specialist as Their Personal Doctor Report Better Experiences With Care.
Collins RL; Elliott MN; Burkhart Q; Haviland A; Gaillot S; Orr N; Friedberg MW
Med Care; 2019 Jun; 57(6):453-459. PubMed ID: 31008897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Patient Satisfaction and Perceived Quality of Care Among Younger Medicare Beneficiaries According to Activity Limitation Stages.
Bernal OA; McClintock HF; Kurichi JE; Kwong PL; Xie D; Streim JE; Pezzin LE; Bogner HR
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Feb; 100(2):289-299. PubMed ID: 30316959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005-2013.
Lines LM; Cohen J; Halpern MT; Smith AW; Kent EE
Cancer Causes Control; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 31422490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Unveiling SEER-CAHPS®: a new data resource for quality of care research.
Chawla N; Urato M; Ambs A; Schussler N; Hays RD; Clauser SB; Zaslavsky AM; Walsh K; Schwartz M; Halpern M; Gaillot S; Goldstein EH; Arora NK
J Gen Intern Med; 2015 May; 30(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 25586868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validating Reports of Chronic Conditions in the Medicare CAHPS Survey.
Brault MW; Landon BE; Zaslavsky AM
Med Care; 2019 Oct; 57(10):830-835. PubMed ID: 31453892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Disability outcomes of older Medicare HMO enrollees and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.
Porell FW; Miltiades HB
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2001 May; 49(5):615-31. PubMed ID: 11380756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience.
Nyweide DJ; Lee W; Cuerdon TT; Pham HH; Cox M; Rajkumar R; Conway PH
JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(21):2152-61. PubMed ID: 25938875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differences in the structure of CAHPS measures among the medicare fee-for-service, medicare managed care, and privately insured populations.
Bender RH; Garfinkel SA
Health Serv Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 11482586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Primary care physician workforce and Medicare beneficiaries' health outcomes.
Chang CH; Stukel TA; Flood AB; Goodman DC
JAMA; 2011 May; 305(20):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21610242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screening Mammography Utilization and Medicare Beneficiaries' Perceptions of Their Primary Care Physicians.
Rosenkrantz AB; Fleming MM; Moy L; Babb JS; Duszak R
Acad Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):461-469. PubMed ID: 29199056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Primary care quality in the Medicare Program: comparing the performance of Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional fee-for-service medicare.
Safran DG; Wilson IB; Rogers WH; Montgomery JE; Chang H
Arch Intern Med; 2002 Apr; 162(7):757-65. PubMed ID: 11926848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Care Experiences Among Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without a Personal Physician.
Martsolf GR; Elliott MN; Haviland AM; Burkhart Q; Orr N; Gaillot S; Saliba D
Med Care; 2018 Apr; 56(4):329-336. PubMed ID: 29462079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.
Kumar A; Rahman M; Trivedi AN; Resnik L; Gozalo P; Mor V
PLoS Med; 2018 Jun; 15(6):e1002592. PubMed ID: 29944655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is the type of Medicare insurance associated with colorectal cancer screening prevalence and selection of screening strategy?
Schneider EC; Rosenthal M; Gatsonis CG; Zheng J; Epstein AM
Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S84-90. PubMed ID: 18725838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Satisfaction With Quality of Health Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Functional Hearing Loss.
Reed NS; Boss EF; Lin FR; Oh ES; Willink A
Med Care; 2021 Jan; 59(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 32925460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utilization of health care services among Medicare beneficiaries who visit federally qualified health centers.
Lavelle TA; Rose AJ; Timbie JW; Setodji CM; Wensky SG; Giuriceo KD; Friedberg MW; Malsberger R; Kahn KL
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):41. PubMed ID: 29370837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicaid beneficiaries' experiences in HMO and fee-for-service health care.
Piña DL
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 1998 Nov; 9(4):433-48. PubMed ID: 10073218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Healthcare experience among older cancer survivors: Analysis of the SEER-CAHPS dataset.
Halpern MT; Urato MP; Lines LM; Cohen JB; Arora NK; Kent EE
J Geriatr Oncol; 2018 May; 9(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 29249645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
