These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Clinical predictors of cardiac events in patients with isolated syncope and negative electrophysiologic study. Da Costa A; Gulian JL; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Messier M; Zarqane N; Samuel B; Khiel A; Isaaz K Int J Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 109(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 15975670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of San Francisco Syncope Rule in elderly ED patients. Schladenhaufen R; Feilinger S; Pollack M; Benenson R; Kusmiesz AL Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Sep; 26(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 18774041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Quinn J; McDermott D; Stiell I; Kohn M; Wells G Ann Emerg Med; 2006 May; 47(5):448-54. PubMed ID: 16631985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population. Birnbaum A; Esses D; Bijur P; Wollowitz A; Gallagher EJ Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Aug; 52(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 18282636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The San Francisco Syncope Rule vs physician judgment and decision making. Quinn JV; Stiell IG; McDermott DA; Kohn MA; Wells GA Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 16182988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction. Brembilla-Perrot B; Suty-Selton C; Houriez P; Claudon O; Beurrier D; de la Chaise AT Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 11467459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule. Sun BC; Mangione CM; Merchant G; Weiss T; Shlamovitz GZ; Zargaraff G; Shiraga S; Hoffman JR; Mower WR Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 49(4):420-7, 427.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17210201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines. Reed MJ; Newby DE; Coull AJ; Jacques KG; Prescott RJ; Gray AJ Emerg Med J; 2007 Apr; 24(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17384381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department. Wathen JE; Rewers AB; Yetman AT; Schaffer MS Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corrected QT interval as a predictor of mortality in elderly patients with syncope. Aggarwal A; Sherazi S; Levitan B; Lakshmanadoss U; Choudhary N; Shah A; Hsi D Cardiol J; 2011; 18(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 21769820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ECG Predictors of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Older Adults With Syncope. Nishijima DK; Lin AL; Weiss RE; Yagapen AN; Malveau SE; Adler DH; Bastani A; Baugh CW; Caterino JM; Clark CL; Diercks DB; Hollander JE; Nicks BA; Shah MN; Stiffler KA; Storrow AB; Wilber ST; Sun BC Ann Emerg Med; 2018 Apr; 71(4):452-461.e3. PubMed ID: 29275946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prolongation of the averaged QRS complex. A simple prognostic factor in patients with post-infarction bundle branch block and a history of syncope]. Brembilla-Perrot B; Suty-Selton C; Houriez P; Claudon O; Beurrier D; Terrier de la Chaise A; Juillière Y; Yassine M Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2000 Nov; 93(11):1285-9. PubMed ID: 11190456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac evaluation for structural abnormalities may not be required in patients presenting with syncope and a normal ECG result in an observation unit setting. Anderson KL; Limkakeng A; Damuth E; Chandra A Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Oct; 60(4):478-84.e1. PubMed ID: 22632775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive value of T-wave abnormalities at the time of emergency department presentation in patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Lin KB; Shofer FS; McCusker C; Meshberg E; Hollander JE Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jun; 15(6):537-43. PubMed ID: 18616439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can myocardial infarction be rapidly identified in emergency department patients who have left bundle-branch block? Kontos MC; McQueen RH; Jesse RL; Tatum JL; Ornato JP Ann Emerg Med; 2001 May; 37(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 11326177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Specificity of electrocardiographic myocardial infarction screening criteria in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Shah BR; Lin C; Maynard C; Bart B; Selvester RH; Shaw LK; O'Connor C; Wagner GS Am Heart J; 1998 Aug; 136(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 9704696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver agreement in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block. Sokolove PE; Sgarbossa EB; Amsterdam EA; Gelber R; Lee TC; Maynard C; Richards JR; Valente R; Wagner GS Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 36(6):566-71. PubMed ID: 11097696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency of acute coronary syndrome in patients with normal electrocardiogram performed during presence or absence of chest pain. Turnipseed SD; Trythall WS; Diercks DB; Laurin EG; Kirk JD; Smith DS; Main DN; Amsterdam EA Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):495-9. PubMed ID: 19426294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]