113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2176327)
1. [MR pelvimetric reference values].
Pfammatter T; Marincek B; von Schulthess GK; Dudenhausen JW
Rofo; 1990 Dec; 153(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2176327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A technic of magnetic resonance tomographic pelvimetry in obstetrics].
Sigmund G; Bauer M; Henne K; DeGregorio G; Wenz W
Rofo; 1991 Apr; 154(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 1850151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obstetric MR pelvimetry: reference values and evaluation of inter- and intraobserver error and intraindividual variability.
Keller TM; Rake A; Michel SC; Seifert B; Efe G; Treiber K; Huch R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 12601187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Do the obstetrically relevant bony pelvic measurements change? A retrospective analysis of computed tomographic pelvic x-rays].
Lehmann KJ; Wischnik A; Zahn K; Georgi M
Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):425-8. PubMed ID: 1596543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Computerized tomography pelvimetry: recent advances].
Buthiau D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 May; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 14567127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pelvimetry with magnetic resonance tomography].
Dudenhausen JW; Pfammatter T; Marincek B; von Schulthess GK; Huch A
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 May; 49(5):477-80. PubMed ID: 2737438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Obstetrical prognosis by x-ray pelvimetry].
Fermandzhieva N; Georgiev I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1991; 30(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 1883050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Use of a microprocessor for pelvimetry (author's transl)].
Halajko A; Curet P; Grellet J
J Radiol; 1980 Mar; 61(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7441616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvimetry and patient acceptability compared between open 0.5-T and closed 1.5-T MR systems.
Michel SC; Rake A; Götzmann L; Seifert B; Ferrazzini M; Chaoui R; Treiber K; Keller TM; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
Eur Radiol; 2002 Dec; 12(12):2898-905. PubMed ID: 12439568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the EOS X-ray imaging system in pelvimetry.
Sigmann MH; Delabrousse E; Riethmuller D; Runge M; Peyron C; Aubry S
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Sep; 95(9):833-8. PubMed ID: 24906809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements?
Capelle C; Devos P; Caudrelier C; Verpillat P; Fourquet T; Puech P; Garabedian C; Lemaitre L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 31473163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Changes in pelvic anatomy in 8 decades--computerized tomography study of obstetrically relevant pelvic measurements].
Wischnik A; Lehmann KJ; Zahn K; Georgi M; Melchert F
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 1609528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging.
Stark DD; McCarthy SM; Filly RA; Parer JT; Hricak H; Callen PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 May; 144(5):947-50. PubMed ID: 3872578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions.
Michel SC; Rake A; Treiber K; Seifert B; Chaoui R; Huch R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 12239066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia.
Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female bony pelvis: MRI pelvimetry.
al-Ahwani S; Assem M; al-Mahallawi N; Abdel-Hamid H
J Belge Radiol; 1991; 74(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2022601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Measurement of the obstetrical pelvis by tomodensitometry (110 cases)].
Daghfous MH; Chechia A; Sfar E; Khaled A; Jouini S; Chelli H; Ben Jaafar M
Tunis Med; 1993 Nov; 71(11):517-21. PubMed ID: 8310543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Possibilities of geometric X-ray examination of the pelvis for partial pelvis replacement].
Gerngross H; Burri C; Claes L; Eckardt V
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1980; 118(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 7415427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Is pelvic clinical evaluation still relevant?].
Moreira P; Ba Guèye M; Moreira I; Mbaye M; Dieng T; Faye EH; Diouf A; Moreau JC
Mali Med; 2008; 23(3):40-3. PubMed ID: 19620032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion.
Lenhard MS; Johnson TR; Weckbach S; Nikolaou K; Friese K; Hasbargen U
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e107-11. PubMed ID: 19443160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
