These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2176327)

  • 1. [MR pelvimetric reference values].
    Pfammatter T; Marincek B; von Schulthess GK; Dudenhausen JW
    Rofo; 1990 Dec; 153(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2176327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A technic of magnetic resonance tomographic pelvimetry in obstetrics].
    Sigmund G; Bauer M; Henne K; DeGregorio G; Wenz W
    Rofo; 1991 Apr; 154(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 1850151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetric MR pelvimetry: reference values and evaluation of inter- and intraobserver error and intraindividual variability.
    Keller TM; Rake A; Michel SC; Seifert B; Efe G; Treiber K; Huch R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 12601187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Do the obstetrically relevant bony pelvic measurements change? A retrospective analysis of computed tomographic pelvic x-rays].
    Lehmann KJ; Wischnik A; Zahn K; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):425-8. PubMed ID: 1596543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Computerized tomography pelvimetry: recent advances].
    Buthiau D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 May; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 14567127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Pelvimetry with magnetic resonance tomography].
    Dudenhausen JW; Pfammatter T; Marincek B; von Schulthess GK; Huch A
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 May; 49(5):477-80. PubMed ID: 2737438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Obstetrical prognosis by x-ray pelvimetry].
    Fermandzhieva N; Georgiev I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1991; 30(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 1883050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Use of a microprocessor for pelvimetry (author's transl)].
    Halajko A; Curet P; Grellet J
    J Radiol; 1980 Mar; 61(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7441616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pelvimetry and patient acceptability compared between open 0.5-T and closed 1.5-T MR systems.
    Michel SC; Rake A; Götzmann L; Seifert B; Ferrazzini M; Chaoui R; Treiber K; Keller TM; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Dec; 12(12):2898-905. PubMed ID: 12439568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the EOS X-ray imaging system in pelvimetry.
    Sigmann MH; Delabrousse E; Riethmuller D; Runge M; Peyron C; Aubry S
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Sep; 95(9):833-8. PubMed ID: 24906809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements?
    Capelle C; Devos P; Caudrelier C; Verpillat P; Fourquet T; Puech P; Garabedian C; Lemaitre L
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 31473163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes in pelvic anatomy in 8 decades--computerized tomography study of obstetrically relevant pelvic measurements].
    Wischnik A; Lehmann KJ; Zahn K; Georgi M; Melchert F
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 1609528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of two pelvimetry methods: 3D models based on CT and MRI.
    Shen P; Fu J; Zhang W; Chen C; Liu P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 May; 296():286-291. PubMed ID: 38503192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Stark DD; McCarthy SM; Filly RA; Parer JT; Hricak H; Callen PW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 May; 144(5):947-50. PubMed ID: 3872578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions.
    Michel SC; Rake A; Treiber K; Seifert B; Chaoui R; Huch R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 12239066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia.
    Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female bony pelvis: MRI pelvimetry.
    al-Ahwani S; Assem M; al-Mahallawi N; Abdel-Hamid H
    J Belge Radiol; 1991; 74(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2022601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Measurement of the obstetrical pelvis by tomodensitometry (110 cases)].
    Daghfous MH; Chechia A; Sfar E; Khaled A; Jouini S; Chelli H; Ben Jaafar M
    Tunis Med; 1993 Nov; 71(11):517-21. PubMed ID: 8310543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Possibilities of geometric X-ray examination of the pelvis for partial pelvis replacement].
    Gerngross H; Burri C; Claes L; Eckardt V
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1980; 118(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 7415427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Is pelvic clinical evaluation still relevant?].
    Moreira P; Ba Guèye M; Moreira I; Mbaye M; Dieng T; Faye EH; Diouf A; Moreau JC
    Mali Med; 2008; 23(3):40-3. PubMed ID: 19620032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.