These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21763518)

  • 1. Physically interactive robotic technology for neuromotor rehabilitation.
    Hogan N; Krebs HI
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 192():59-68. PubMed ID: 21763518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic Therapy and the Paradox of the Diminishing Number of Degrees of Freedom.
    Krebs HI; Saitoh E; Hogan N
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2015 Nov; 26(4):691-702. PubMed ID: 26522906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-hemispheric coupling changes associate with motor improvements after robotic stroke rehabilitation.
    Pellegrino G; Tomasevic L; Tombini M; Assenza G; Bravi M; Sterzi S; Giacobbe V; Zollo L; Guglielmelli E; Cavallo G; Vernieri F; Tecchio F
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2012; 30(6):497-510. PubMed ID: 22868224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
    Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing and inducing neuroplasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation and robotics for motor function.
    O'Malley MK; Ro T; Levin HS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Suppl 2):S59-66. PubMed ID: 17140881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
    Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic technology and physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Krebs HI
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 22614892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy.
    Brokaw EB; Nichols D; Holley RJ; Lum PS
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 24297763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain-computer interface after nervous system injury.
    Burns A; Adeli H; Buford JA
    Neuroscientist; 2014 Dec; 20(6):639-51. PubMed ID: 25193343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery.
    Volpe BT; Huerta PT; Zipse JL; Rykman A; Edwards D; Dipietro L; Hogan N; Krebs HI
    Arch Neurol; 2009 Sep; 66(9):1086-90. PubMed ID: 19752297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot therapy of the upper limb in stroke patients: preliminary experiences for the principle-based use of this technology.
    Casadio M; Giannoni P; Masia L; Morasso P; Sandini G; Sanguineti V; Squeri V; Vergaro E
    Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 20412725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nuclear medicine in the rehabilitative treatment evaluation in stroke recovery. Role of diaschisis resolution and cerebral reorganization.
    Mountz JM
    Eura Medicophys; 2007 Jun; 43(2):221-39. PubMed ID: 17268387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automating activity-based interventions: the role of robotics.
    Hidler J; Hamm LF; Lichy A; Groah SL
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 18566951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke.
    Remsik A; Young B; Vermilyea R; Kiekhoefer L; Abrams J; Evander Elmore S; Schultz P; Nair V; Edwards D; Williams J; Prabhakaran V
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016 May; 13(5):445-54. PubMed ID: 27112213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary results of BRAVO project: brain computer interfaces for Robotic enhanced Action in Visuo-motOr tasks.
    Bergamasco M; Frisoli A; Fontana M; Loconsole C; Leonardis D; Troncossi M; Foumashi MM; Parenti-Castelli V
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975377. PubMed ID: 22275581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual feedback distortion in a robotic environment for hand rehabilitation.
    Brewer BR; Klatzky R; Matsuoka Y
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 18394527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Technological advances in neurorehabilitation].
    Gutiérrez-Martínez J; Núñez-Gaona MA; Carrillo-Mora P
    Rev Invest Clin; 2014 Jul; 66 Suppl 1():S8-23. PubMed ID: 25264802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual reality and robotics for stroke rehabilitation: where do we go from here?
    Wade E; Winstein CJ
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2011; 18(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 22436307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinematic data analysis for post-stroke patients following bilateral versus unilateral rehabilitation with an upper limb wearable robotic system.
    Kim H; Miller LM; Fedulow I; Simkins M; Abrams GM; Byl N; Rosen J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Mar; 21(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 22855233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.