These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21763715)

  • 21. Towards uncertainty quantification and inference in the stochastic SIR epidemic model.
    Capistrán MA; Christen JA; Velasco-Hernández JX
    Math Biosci; 2012 Dec; 240(2):250-9. PubMed ID: 22989951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian inference for stochastic kinetic models using a diffusion approximation.
    Golightly A; Wilkinson DJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):781-8. PubMed ID: 16135029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of parameter uncertainty for an activated sludge model using Bayesian inference: a comparison with the frequentist method.
    Zonta ZJ; Flotats X; Magrí A
    Environ Technol; 2014 Aug; 35(13-16):1618-29. PubMed ID: 24956752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Velocity-based cardiac contractility personalization from images using derivative-free optimization.
    Wong KC; Sermesant M; Rhode K; Ginks M; Rinaldi CA; Razavi R; Delingette H; Ayache N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Mar; 43():35-52. PubMed ID: 25553554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ecological Dynamics: Integrating Empirical, Statistical, and Analytical Methods.
    Laubmeier AN; Cazelles B; Cuddington K; Erickson KD; Fortin MJ; Ogle K; Wikle CK; Zhu K; Zipkin EF
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 35(12):1090-1099. PubMed ID: 32933777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Uncertainty and variability in models of the cardiac action potential: Can we build trustworthy models?
    Johnstone RH; Chang ETY; Bardenet R; de Boer TP; Gavaghan DJ; Pathmanathan P; Clayton RH; Mirams GR
    J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 96():49-62. PubMed ID: 26611884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Bayesian perspective on stochastic neurocontrol.
    Herzallah R; Lowe D
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2008 May; 19(5):914-24. PubMed ID: 18467218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bayesian methodology for model uncertainty using model performance data.
    Droguett EL; Mosleh A
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1457-76. PubMed ID: 18793282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Harnessing the theoretical foundations of the exponential and beta-Poisson dose-response models to quantify parameter uncertainty using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
    Schmidt PJ; Pintar KD; Fazil AM; Topp E
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1677-93. PubMed ID: 23311599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using a reliability process to reduce uncertainty in predicting crashes at unsignalized intersections.
    Haleem K; Abdel-Aty M; Mackie K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):654-66. PubMed ID: 20159091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficient computation of electrograms and ECGs in human whole heart simulations using a reaction-eikonal model.
    Neic A; Campos FO; Prassl AJ; Niederer SA; Bishop MJ; Vigmond EJ; Plank G
    J Comput Phys; 2017 Oct; 346():191-211. PubMed ID: 28819329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inference and uncertainty quantification of stochastic gene expression via synthetic models.
    Öcal K; Gutmann MU; Sanguinetti G; Grima R
    J R Soc Interface; 2022 Jul; 19(192):20220153. PubMed ID: 35858045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uncertainty and variability in computational and mathematical models of cardiac physiology.
    Mirams GR; Pathmanathan P; Gray RA; Challenor P; Clayton RH
    J Physiol; 2016 Dec; 594(23):6833-6847. PubMed ID: 26990229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A note on the validity of statistical bootstrapping for estimating the uncertainty of tensor parameters in diffusion tensor images.
    Yuan Y; Zhu H; Ibrahim JG; Lin W; Peterson BS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1506-14. PubMed ID: 18815102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A hierarchical Bayesian model averaging framework for groundwater prediction under uncertainty.
    Chitsazan N; Tsai FT
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(2):305-16. PubMed ID: 24890644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling of nonlinear biological phenomena modeled by S-systems.
    Mansouri MM; Nounou HN; Nounou MN; Datta AA
    Math Biosci; 2014 Mar; 249():75-91. PubMed ID: 24524881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A conduction velocity adapted eikonal model for electrophysiology problems with re-excitability evaluation.
    Corrado C; Zemzemi N
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jan; 43():186-197. PubMed ID: 29128759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bioprocess optimization under uncertainty using ensemble modeling.
    Liu Y; Gunawan R
    J Biotechnol; 2017 Feb; 244():34-44. PubMed ID: 28137617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Embedding high-dimensional Bayesian optimization via generative modeling: Parameter personalization of cardiac electrophysiological models.
    Dhamala J; Bajracharya P; Arevalo HJ; Sapp JL; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L
    Med Image Anal; 2020 May; 62():101670. PubMed ID: 32171168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach.
    Donders WP; Huberts W; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 26017545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.