These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21763910)

  • 1. Cutting efficiency of twisted versus machined nickel-titanium endodontic files.
    Fayyad DM; Elhakim Elgendy AA
    J Endod; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1143-6. PubMed ID: 21763910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation.
    Bier CA; Shemesh H; Tanomaru-Filho M; Wesselink PR; Wu MK
    J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 19166781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
    Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials.
    Somma F; Cammarota G; Plotino G; Grande NM; Pameijer CH
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 18358899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.
    Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.
    Kim HC; Lee MH; Yum J; Versluis A; Lee CJ; Kim BM
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1195-9. PubMed ID: 20630298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices.
    Shen Y; Coil JM; McLean AG; Hemerling DL; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1363-7. PubMed ID: 19801231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files.
    Kim HC; Yum J; Hur B; Cheung GS
    J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 20003955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two techniques for assessing the shaping efficacy of repeatedly used nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Ounsi HF; Franciosi G; Paragliola R; Al-Hezaimi K; Salameh Z; Tay FR; Ferrari M; Grandini S
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):847-50. PubMed ID: 21787503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of electropolishing on torque and force during simulated root canal preparation with ProTaper shaping files.
    Boessler C; Paque F; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 19084135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
    Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval canals.
    Hilaly Eid GE; Wanees Amin SA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 21862367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 2: Fractographic analysis of fractured surface in a cohort study.
    Shen Y; Cheung GS; Peng B; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19084143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Kim HC; Cheung GS; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Kang SI
    J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 18498904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
    Gergi R; Sabbagh C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.