179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21765193)
1. FDG-PET/CT compared with conventional imaging in the detection of distant metastases of primary breast cancer.
Niikura N; Costelloe CM; Madewell JE; Hayashi N; Yu TK; Liu J; Palla SL; Tokuda Y; Theriault RL; Hortobagyi GN; Ueno NT
Oncologist; 2011; 16(8):1111-9. PubMed ID: 21765193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Herrmann J; Nagarajah J; Hecktor J; Kuemmel S; Otterbach F; Hahn S; Bockisch A; Lauenstein T; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 May; 39(5):852-63. PubMed ID: 22392069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying distant metastatic disease missed by conventional imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
Manohar K; Mittal BR; Bhoil A; Bhattacharya A; Singh G
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Jun; 34(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 23549551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-body
Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma.
Manohar K; Mittal BR; Senthil R; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Singh G
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 22334135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Detection of metastases in breast cancer patients: comparison of FDG PET with chest X-ray, bone scintigraphy and ultrasound of the abdomen].
Dose-Schwarz J; Mahner S; Schirrmacher S; Jenicke L; Müller V; Habermann CR; Brenner W
Nuklearmedizin; 2008; 47(3):97-103. PubMed ID: 18493688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques.
Koolen BB; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Aukema TS; Vogel WV; Oldenburg HS; van der Hage JA; Hoefnagel CA; Stokkel MP; Loo CE; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 21935602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer.
Mahner S; Schirrmacher S; Brenner W; Jenicke L; Habermann CR; Avril N; Dose-Schwarz J
Ann Oncol; 2008 Jul; 19(7):1249-1254. PubMed ID: 18356138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma: a comparison to conventional imaging.
Gallowitsch HJ; Kresnik E; Gasser J; Kumnig G; Igerc I; Mikosch P; Lind P
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 12750613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Pretreatment Combined (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Staging on Radiation Therapy Treatment Decisions in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Ng SP; David S; Alamgeer M; Ganju V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Sep; 93(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 26279029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for distant metastases in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: the impact of different imaging modalities on distant recurrence-free interval.
Poodt IGM; Schipper RJ; de Greef BTA; Vugts G; Maaskant-Braat AJG; Jansen FH; Wyndaele DNJ; Voogd AC; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP;
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jun; 175(2):419-428. PubMed ID: 30955183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis of metastases from postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison between FDG and FLT PET/CT studies.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kajiya Y; Tanabe H; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Koriyama C
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):891-901. PubMed ID: 23468571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial staging impact of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in locally advanced breast cancer.
Niikura N; Liu J; Costelloe CM; Palla SL; Madewell JE; Hayashi N; Yu TK; Tokuda Y; Theriault RL; Hortobagyi GN; Ueno NT
Oncologist; 2011; 16(6):772-82. PubMed ID: 21632453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures.
Fuster D; Duch J; Paredes P; Velasco M; Muñoz M; Santamaría G; Fontanillas M; Pons F
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 26(29):4746-51. PubMed ID: 18695254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Koeninger A; Hartung V; Otterbach F; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 23002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years.
Riedl CC; Slobod E; Jochelson M; Morrow M; Goldman DA; Gonen M; Weber WA; Ulaner GA
J Nucl Med; 2014 Oct; 55(10):1578-83. PubMed ID: 25214641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan.
Garami Z; Hascsi Z; Varga J; Dinya T; Tanyi M; Garai I; Damjanovich L; Galuska L
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21937190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is the diagnostic performance of 18-FDG-PET/MR compared to PET/CT for the N- and M- staging of breast cancer?
Botsikas D; Bagetakos I; Picarra M; Da Cunha Afonso Barisits AC; Boudabbous S; Montet X; Lam GT; Mainta I; Kalovidouri A; Becker M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1787-1798. PubMed ID: 30267154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography.
Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Umutlu L; Koeninger A; Freudenberg LS; Hauth EA; Kimmig KR; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
J Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 49(8):1215-22. PubMed ID: 18632831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in staging, restaging, and treatment response assessment of male breast cancer.
Groheux D; Hindié E; Marty M; Espié M; Rubello D; Vercellino L; Bousquet G; Ohnona J; Toubert ME; Merlet P; Misset JL
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1925-33. PubMed ID: 24985086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
