These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21765204)

  • 1. Automatic evaluation of intrapartum fetal heart rate recordings: a comprehensive analysis of useful features.
    Chudáček V; Spilka J; Janků P; Koucký M; Lhotská L; Huptych M
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Aug; 32(8):1347-60. PubMed ID: 21765204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of features for automatic CTG analysis based on expert annotation.
    Chudácek V; Spilka J; Lhotská L; Janku P; Koucký M; Huptych M; Bursa M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6051-4. PubMed ID: 22255719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A new approach to quantitative electronic foetal heart-rate analysis].
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2010 Jan; 214(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20155661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of the dynamic relationship between intrapartum uterine pressure and fetal heart rate for normal and hypoxic fetuses.
    Warrick PA; Hamilton EF; Precup D; Kearney RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1587-97. PubMed ID: 19237336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of intrapartum cardiotocography in twin deliveries.
    Bakker PC; Colenbrander GJ; Verstraeten AA; Van Geijn HP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2114-9. PubMed ID: 15592300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fetal heart rate during labour: definitions and interpretation].
    Martin A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S34-45. PubMed ID: 18191915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal heart rate classification using generative models.
    Dash S; Quirk JG; Djurić PM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 61(11):2796-805. PubMed ID: 24951678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
    Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal pulse oximetry: correlation with intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns and neonatal outcome.
    Tekin A; Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Ozeren S; Corakçi A; Yücesoy I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Oct; 34(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 18834341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings.
    Signorini MG; Magenes G; Cerutti S; Arduini D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 12669993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in labor: detection of intervals with un-assignable baseline.
    Georgieva A; Payne SJ; Moulden M; Redman CW
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1549-60. PubMed ID: 21862845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of empirical mode decomposition for the enhancement of cardiotocograph signals.
    Krupa BN; Mohd Ali MA; Zahedi E
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Aug; 30(8):729-43. PubMed ID: 19550027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of the complexity of fetal heart rate. Determining the dimension].
    Lange S; van Leeuwen P; Bettermann H; Grönemeyer D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():59-60. PubMed ID: 9517046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Feb; 39(2):106-18. PubMed ID: 19193367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different types of variable decelerations and their effects to neonatal outcome.
    Kazandi M; Sendag F; Akercan F; Terek MC; Gundem G
    Singapore Med J; 2003 May; 44(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 13677360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis and management of intrapartum fetal distress.
    van Geijn HP; Copray FJ; Donkers DK; Bos MH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1991 Dec; 42 Suppl():S63-72. PubMed ID: 1809612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Passive fetal monitoring by adaptive wavelet denoising method.
    Vaisman S; Salem SY; Holcberg G; Geva AB
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Feb; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 22169397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature selection using genetic algorithms for fetal heart rate analysis.
    Xu L; Redman CW; Payne SJ; Georgieva A
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1357-71. PubMed ID: 24854596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.