These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21765544)

  • 1. The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.
    Brackney RJ; Cheung TH; Neisewander JL; Sanabria F
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 21765544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. About bouts: A heterogeneous tandem schedule of reinforcement reveals dissociable components of operant behavior in Fischer rats.
    Daniels CW; Sanabria F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):280-294. PubMed ID: 29120215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of lever height on the microstructure of operant behavior.
    Jiménez ÁA; Sanabria F; Cabrera F
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():181-189. PubMed ID: 28499811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The distribution of response bout lengths and its sensitivity to differential reinforcement.
    Brackney RJ; Sanabria F
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Sep; 104(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 26377437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.
    Brackney RJ; Garcia R; Sanabria F
    Learn Behav; 2021 Sep; 49(3):330-342. PubMed ID: 33629243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing operant hyperactivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat.
    Hill JC; Herbst K; Sanabria F
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Jan; 8():5. PubMed ID: 22277367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interval timing under a behavioral microscope: Dissociating motivational and timing processes in fixed-interval performance.
    Daniels CW; Sanabria F
    Learn Behav; 2017 Mar; 45(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 27443193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of force requirements on microstructure: Subcriterion responses and the mismeasurement of bouts.
    Pinkston JW; Moore A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jul; 114(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 32618011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bouts, Pauses, and Units of Operant Performance: A Primer.
    Falligant JM; Hagopian LP; Newland MC
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2024 Sep; 47(3):643-674. PubMed ID: 39309239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extinction learning deficit in a rodent model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Brackney RJ; Cheung TH; Herbst K; Hill JC; Sanabria F
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Dec; 8():59. PubMed ID: 23237608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations.
    Newland MC
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9832996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extinction under a behavioral microscope: isolating the sources of decline in operant response rate.
    Cheung TH; Neisewander JL; Sanabria F
    Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 22425782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A bout analysis of operant response disruption.
    Brackney RJ; Cheung THC; Sanabria F
    Behav Processes; 2017 Aug; 141(Pt 1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28431947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response-bout analysis of interresponse times in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():12-21. PubMed ID: 27619956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bouts of responding from variable-interval reinforcement of lever pressing by rats.
    Shull RL; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 14674726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement.
    Gulotta KB; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():93-7. PubMed ID: 26536304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task parameters influence operant response variability in mice.
    Follman EG; Chevée M; Kim CJ; Johnson AR; Tat J; Leonard MZ; Calipari ES
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2023 Jan; 240(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 36572717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction.
    Shull RL; Gaynor ST; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):211-31. PubMed ID: 12083677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling bout-pause response patterns in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules using hierarchical Bayesian methodology.
    Matsui H; Yamada K; Sakagami T; Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():346-353. PubMed ID: 30059765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type.
    Shull RL; Gaynor ST; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):247-74. PubMed ID: 11453618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.