These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21765545)

  • 1. Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.
    Boutros N; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 21765545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20885807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):63-86. PubMed ID: 21765546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency and value both matter in the suboptimal choice procedure.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30569554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Animal procrastination: Pigeons choose to defer experiencing an aversive gap or a peck requirement.
    Zentall TR; Peng D; House D; Halloran M
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 31845110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.
    da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):395-413. PubMed ID: 21119853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Distractor" effects in delay discounting of probability by pigeons.
    Mueller PM; Peng DN; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Jun; 26(3):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 36853524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signaled alternative reinforcement and the persistence of operant behavior.
    Bland VJ; Bai JY; Fullerton JA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jul; 106(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27282131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus effects on local preference: stimulus-response contingencies, stimulus-food pairing, and stimulus-food correlation.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 20676267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environment tracking and signal following in a reinforcer-ratio reversal procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():208-224. PubMed ID: 30315866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.
    McDevitt MA; Diller JW; Pietrzykowski MO
    Learn Behav; 2019 Dec; 47(4):334-343. PubMed ID: 31429009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing functions of stimuli associated with rich-to-lean transitions using a choice procedure.
    Langford JS; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jul; 112(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 31257618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance to change and frequency of response-dependent stimuli uncorrelated with reinforcement.
    Podlesnik CA; Jimenez-Gomez C; Ward RD; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):199-214. PubMed ID: 20354599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of contingency discriminability in suboptimal choice.
    López-Tolsa GE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104511. PubMed ID: 34562512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.