These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2176699)

  • 1. A maximum likelihood approach to the detection of selection from a phylogeny.
    Golding B; Felsenstein J
    J Mol Evol; 1990 Dec; 31(6):511-23. PubMed ID: 2176699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequence evolution within populations under multiple types of mutation.
    Golding GB; Aquadro CF; Langley CH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1986 Jan; 83(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 3001736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATES OF SELECTION COEFFICIENTS FROM DNA SEQUENCE DATA.
    Golding B
    Evolution; 1993 Oct; 47(5):1420-1431. PubMed ID: 28564901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular evolution of P transposable elements in the genus Drosophila. III. The melanogaster species group.
    Clark JB; Kim PC; Kidwell MG
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Jun; 15(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 9615456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic inference: linear invariants and maximum likelihood.
    Navidi WC; Churchill GA; von Haeseler A
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):543-55. PubMed ID: 7690255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
    Vy HM; Kim Y
    Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of properties over phylogenetic trees using stochastic logics.
    Requeno JI; Colom JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):235. PubMed ID: 27301397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing the data size to accurately reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships between nine subgroups of the Drosophila melanogaster species group (Drosophilidae, Diptera).
    Yang Y; Hou ZC; Qian YH; Kang H; Zeng QT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Jan; 62(1):214-23. PubMed ID: 21985965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Patterns of transposable elements distribution on the Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes before and after selection for a quantitative trait].
    Zakharenko LP; Perepelkina MP; Antonenko OV; Vykhristiuk OV; Efimov VM; Vasil'eva LA
    Tsitologiia; 2011; 53(6):517-27. PubMed ID: 21870509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High divergence among Drosophila simulans mitochondrial haplogroups arose in midst of long term purifying selection.
    Dean MD; Ballard JW
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Aug; 36(2):328-37. PubMed ID: 15955513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.
    Ko WY; David RM; Akashi H
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Nov; 57(5):562-73. PubMed ID: 14738315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the potential of RAD-sequencing to resolve phylogenetic relationships within species radiations: The fly genus Chiastocheta (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) as a case study.
    Suchan T; Espíndola A; Rutschmann S; Emerson BC; Gori K; Dessimoz C; Arrigo N; Ronikier M; Alvarez N
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():189-198. PubMed ID: 28645767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positive selection has driven the evolution of the Drosophila insulin-like receptor (InR) at different timescales.
    Guirao-Rico S; Aguadé M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Aug; 26(8):1723-32. PubMed ID: 19398492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting for sequencing error in maximum likelihood phylogeny inference.
    Kuhner MK; McGill J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Nov; 4(12):2545-52. PubMed ID: 25378476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for interspecific transfer of the transposable element mariner between Drosophila and Zaprionus.
    Maruyama K; Hartl DL
    J Mol Evol; 1991 Dec; 33(6):514-24. PubMed ID: 1664000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction.
    Crandall KA; Templeton AR
    Genetics; 1993 Jul; 134(3):959-69. PubMed ID: 8349118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology.
    Huelsenbeck JP; Ronquist F; Nielsen R; Bollback JP
    Science; 2001 Dec; 294(5550):2310-4. PubMed ID: 11743192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic analysis of polymorphic DNA sequences at the Adh locus in Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species.
    Stephens JC; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 1985; 22(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 3003368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational advances in maximum likelihood methods for molecular phylogeny.
    Schadt EE; Sinsheimer JS; Lange K
    Genome Res; 1998 Mar; 8(3):222-33. PubMed ID: 9521926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restriction-map variation in the Notch region of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Schaeffer SW; Aquadro CF; Langley CH
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 Jan; 5(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 2833676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.