These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767049)

  • 1. Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.
    Bugg JM; McDaniel MA; Scullin MK; Braver TS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1595-606. PubMed ID: 21767049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. List-wide control is not entirely elusive: evidence from picture-word Stroop.
    Bugg JM; Chanani S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):930-6. PubMed ID: 21638107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 32150437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task.
    Bugg JM; Jacoby LL; Toth JP
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1484-94. PubMed ID: 19015507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.
    Pan Y; Zhang Z; Hu X; Zuo W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1635-1650. PubMed ID: 35501589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidental memory for colour word associates processed in colour naming and reading aloud tasks: is a blue
    Cortese MJ; Khanna MM; Von Nordheim D
    Memory; 2019 Aug; 27(7):924-930. PubMed ID: 31021306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.