BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767050)

  • 1. Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection.
    Yang CT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1708-28. PubMed ID: 21767050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative salience affects the process of detecting changes in orientation and luminance.
    Yang CT; Hsu YF; Huang HY; Yeh YY
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):377-89. PubMed ID: 21974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes.
    Yang CT; Chang TY; Wu CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1365-85. PubMed ID: 23148473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention modulates the effect of target location probability on redundant signal processing.
    Chang TY; Little DR; Yang CT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1603-24. PubMed ID: 27188653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes.
    Stirk JA; Underwood G
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures.
    Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1739-59. PubMed ID: 19933559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal detection using various temporal and spatial configurations.
    Schirillo JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 21258922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The electrophysiological correlate of saliency: evidence from a figure-detection task.
    Straube S; Fahle M
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():89-102. PubMed ID: 19854163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why does a red snake in the grass capture your attention?
    Huang YM; Yeh YY
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 21500891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tuning perceptual competition.
    Wascher E; Beste C
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 103(2):1057-65. PubMed ID: 20032246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the growth of internal evidence guiding perceptual decisions.
    Ludwig CJ; Davies JR
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Sep; 63(2):61-92. PubMed ID: 21699877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance.
    Donk M; Soesman L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):286-302. PubMed ID: 20364919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual saliency and spike timing in the ventral visual pathway.
    VanRullen R
    J Physiol Paris; 2003; 97(2-3):365-77. PubMed ID: 14766152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological evidence for different types of change detection and change blindness.
    Busch NA; Fründ I; Herrmann CS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1852-69. PubMed ID: 19580382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A semi-automated approach to balancing of bottom-up salience for predicting change detection performance.
    Verma M; McOwan PW
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):3. PubMed ID: 20884552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional-singleton interference in efficient visual search: a common salience route for detection and compound tasks.
    Zehetleitner M; Proulx MJ; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1760-70. PubMed ID: 19933560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional modulation of perceptual comparison for feature binding.
    Kuo BC; Rotshtein P; Yeh YY
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 22055622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.
    Prinzmetal W; McCool C; Park S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 15702964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.