BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767051)

  • 1. Perceptual and cognitive load interact to control the spatial focus of attention.
    Linnell KJ; Caparos S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1643-8. PubMed ID: 21767051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trait anxiety focuses spatial attention.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    Emotion; 2012 Feb; 12(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 22148993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual load alters visual excitability.
    Carmel D; Thorne JD; Rees G; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21728464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implicit learning modulates selective attention at sensory levels of perceptual processing.
    Couperus JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 19304623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interplay of spatial attention and memory: evidence for memory-driven spatial compatibility effects, but not for a facilitating role of attention in memory retrieval.
    Vankov I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2124-9. PubMed ID: 21671154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load: a closer look at load theory.
    Fitousi D; Wenger MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):781-98. PubMed ID: 21500943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
    Wood JN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period.
    Brisson B; Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19000734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder.
    Remington A; Swettenham J; Campbell R; Coleman M
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1388-93. PubMed ID: 19843262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of spatial separation of stimuli on children's discrimination learning.
    Etaugh CF; Pope BK
    Child Dev; 1974 Dec; 45(4):1170-2. PubMed ID: 4143875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.
    He J; McCarley JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information.
    Murray JE; Jones C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):609-25. PubMed ID: 12047062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial guidance of choice behavior in the radial-arm maze.
    Brown MF; Rish PA; VonCulin JE; Edberg JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Jul; 19(3):195-214. PubMed ID: 8340766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy.
    Konar Y; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 20424020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.
    Wilson PN; Alexander T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 18980401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.