These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767051)

  • 41. Attentional resource demands of stimulus encoding for persons with and without mental retardation.
    Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 1992 Jul; 97(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 1497867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
    Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study.
    Fu S; Zinni M; Squire PN; Kumar R; Caggiano DM; Parasuraman R
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1345-55. PubMed ID: 18006335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. To hear or not to hear: Voice processing under visual load.
    Zäske R; Perlich MC; Schweinberger SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1488-95. PubMed ID: 27150617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of cognitive foveal load on a peripheral single-target detection task.
    Chan HS; Courtney AJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Oct; 77(2):515-33. PubMed ID: 8247676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the automaticity of pure perceptual sequence learning.
    Coomans D; Deroost N; Zeischka P; Soetens E
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1460-72. PubMed ID: 21741273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Slippage theory and the flanker paradigm: an early-selection account of selective attention failures.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Jung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1257-73. PubMed ID: 24730746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Negative affective state mimics effects of perceptual load on spatial perception.
    Rossi V; Pourtois G
    Emotion; 2013 Jun; 13(3):485-96. PubMed ID: 23205523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Perceptual load improves the expression but not learning of relevant sequence information.
    Deroost N; Coomans D; Soetens E
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 19261583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of feature uncertainty on spatial discriminations.
    Vogels R; Eeckhout H; Orban GA
    Perception; 1988; 17(5):565-77. PubMed ID: 3249664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Some perceptual and cognitive factors in mirror tracing: their limits.
    Borresen CR; Klingsporn MJ
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Oct; 119(4):365-84. PubMed ID: 1491240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Interference in visual perception by verbal and spatial cognitive activity.
    Pérez-Moreno E; Conchillo A; Recarte MA
    Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):556-68. PubMed ID: 22059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The two sides of temporal orienting: facilitating perceptual selection, disrupting response selection.
    Correa A; Cappucci P; Nobre AC; Lupiáñez J
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20178944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perceptual processing and search efficiency of young and older adults in a simple-feature search task: a staircase approach.
    Davis ET; Fujawa G; Shikano T
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2002 Jul; 57(4):P324-37. PubMed ID: 12084783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.