These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767059)
1. Ideals and category typicality. Kim S; Murphy GL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1092-112. PubMed ID: 21767059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the determinants of the graded structure of vocal emotion expressions. Laukka P; Audibert N; Aubergé V Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(4):710-9. PubMed ID: 21851327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: geometric shapes and social categories. Rothbart M; Lewis S J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Dec; 55(6):861-72. PubMed ID: 3216287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach. Voorspoels W; Storms G; Vanpaemel W Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1721-39. PubMed ID: 22537154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options. Davis T; Love BC Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20424052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is typical about the typicality effect in category-based induction? Rein JR; Goldwater MB; Markman AB Mem Cognit; 2010 Apr; 38(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 20234027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of verbal typicality judgments of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons. Winters JJ; Hoats DL Am J Ment Defic; 1985 Nov; 90(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 4083313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain categories. Griffiths O; Hayes BK; Newell BR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):576-95. PubMed ID: 22060277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments. Sim EJ; Kiefer M Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):260-73. PubMed ID: 15993764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Idealness and similarity in goal-derived categories: a computational examination. Voorspoels W; Storms G; Vanpaemel W Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):312-27. PubMed ID: 22972665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ideal is typical. Burnett RC; Medin DL; Ross NO; Blok SV Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Mar; 59(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 15832626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulus-Response Bindings in the Go/NoGo Task: Effects on the Judged Typicality of Stimuli. Ramos T; Garcia-Marques L; Santos AS; Carneiro P Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 26138301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment. Pettibone JC; Wedell DH Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):361-89. PubMed ID: 17196919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness. Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Dougherty M; Mehta J; Spence M Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 17086079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probability assessment with response times and confidence in perception and knowledge. Petrusic WM; Baranski JV Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 19081556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories. Larochelle S; Richard S; Soulières I Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):929-61. PubMed ID: 11131822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Embodiment, agency, and attitude change. Taylor CA; Lord CG; Bond CF J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Dec; 97(6):946-62. PubMed ID: 19968412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]