176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767060)
1. The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
Miller MB; Guerin SA; Wolford GL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1228-35. PubMed ID: 21767060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective warnings in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false-memory paradigm: the role of identifiability.
Neuschatz JS; Benoit GE; Payne DG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 12549581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of decision criterion in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false recognition memory: False memory falls and rises as a function of restriction on criterion setting.
Jou J; Escamilla EE; Arredondo ML; Pena L; Zuniga R; Perez M; Garcia C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):499-521. PubMed ID: 27808007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-induced priming impairs source monitoring accuracy in the DRM procedure.
Dewhurst SA; Knott LM; Howe ML
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21480753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. False recognition with the Deese-Roediger-McDermott-Reid-Solso procedure: a quantitative summary.
McKelvie SJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 2):1387-408. PubMed ID: 15291231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociative effects of phonological vs. semantic associates on recognition memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Tse CS; Li Y; Neill WT
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 21377636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. False recognition in Lewy-body disease and frontotemporal dementia.
de Boysson C; Belleville S; Phillips NA; Johns EK; Goupil D; Souchay C; Bouchard R; Chertkow H
Brain Cogn; 2011 Mar; 75(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 21094574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of rehearsal and generation in false memory creation.
Marsh EJ; Bower GH
Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):748-61. PubMed ID: 15724363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False memory across languages: implicit associative response vs fuzzy trace views.
Cabeza R; Lennartson ER
Memory; 2005 Jan; 13(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15724903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Hancock TW; Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L
Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12710219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confabulation versus experimentally induced false memories in Korsakoff patients.
Van Damme I; d'Ydewalle G
J Neuropsychol; 2010 Sep; 4(Pt 2):211-30. PubMed ID: 19930792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mood and the DRM paradigm: An investigation of the effects of valence and arousal on false memory.
Van Damme I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1060-81. PubMed ID: 23057583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of backward associative strength and interitem connectivity.
Knott LM; Dewhurst SA; Howe ML
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):229-39. PubMed ID: 21875250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of increasing semantic-associate list length on the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false recognition memory: Dual false-memory process in retrieval from sub- and supraspan lists.
Jou J; Arredondo ML; Li C; Escamilla EE; Zuniga R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2076-2093. PubMed ID: 27606720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Associative relatedness enhances recall and produces false memories in immediate serial recall.
Tehan G
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Dec; 64(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21186910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation of false memory in perceptual implicit tasks.
McBride DM; Coane JH; Raulerson BA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):240-60. PubMed ID: 16510106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developmental reversals in false memory: now you see them, now you don't!
Holliday RE; Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF
Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 47(2):442-9. PubMed ID: 21142371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
