These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767064)

  • 1. Communicating environmental risks: Clarifying the severity effect in interpretations of verbal probability expressions.
    Harris AJ; Corner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1571-8. PubMed ID: 21767064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
    Budescu DV; Broomell S; Por HH
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Mar; 20(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 19207697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verbal expressions of probability in informed consent litigation.
    Merz JF; Druzdzel MJ; Mazur DJ
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 1766330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients' interpretations of verbal probability terms.
    Mazur DJ; Merz JF
    J Gen Intern Med; 1994 May; 9(5):268-71. PubMed ID: 8046529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adolescents' misinterpretation of health risk probability expressions.
    Cohn LD; Schydlower M; Foley J; Copeland RL
    Pediatrics; 1995 May; 95(5):713-6. PubMed ID: 7724309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of order of presentation of verbal probability expressions on numerical estimates in a medical context.
    Bergenstrom A; Sherr L
    Psychol Health Med; 2003 Nov; 8(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 21974729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' interpretations of verbal expressions of probability: implications for securing informed consent to medical interventions.
    Mazur DJ; Merz JF
    Behav Sci Law; 1994; 12(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 10150709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases.
    Bonnefon JF; Villejoubert G
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):747-51. PubMed ID: 16984289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials.
    Weinfurt KP; Depuy V; Castel LD; Sulmasy DP; Schulman KA; Meropol NJ
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 15534885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: informed consent issues.
    Pattee C; Ballantyne M; Milne B
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Sep; 44(9):918-23. PubMed ID: 9305553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal probabilities: an alternative approach.
    Teigen HK; Juanchich M; Filkuková P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):124-46. PubMed ID: 23714010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Circumcision and informed consent. Is more information always better?
    Christensen-Szalanski JJ; Boyce WT; Harrell H; Gardner MM
    Med Care; 1987 Sep; 25(9):856-67. PubMed ID: 3695678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the probability of negative events.
    Harris AJ; Corner A; Hahn U
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 19036359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed consent for bone marrow transplantation: identification of relevant information by referring physicians.
    Singer DA; Donnelly MB; Messerschmidt GL
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1990 Dec; 6(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 2097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent.
    Lescale KB; Inglis SR; Eddleman KA; Peeper EQ; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8688110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent in endoscopic sinus surgery: the patient perspective.
    Wolf JS; Chiu AG; Palmer JN; O'Malley BW; Schofield K; Taylor RJ
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):492-4. PubMed ID: 15744164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information.
    Shukla AN; Daly MK; Legutko P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 22062774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Interpretation and memorization of information provided to the patient for parotidectomy].
    Laccourreye L; Werner A; Cauchois R; Laccourreye O
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 19345932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures.
    Sulmasy DP; Lehmann LS; Levine DM; Raden RR
    J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 7857407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.