These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767213)

  • 1. In situ tooth replica custom implant: a 3-dimensional finite element stress and strain analysis.
    Ghuneim WA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):559-73. PubMed ID: 21767213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
    Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distribution of occlusal forces during occlusal adjustment of dental implant prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis considering the capacity for displacement of opposing teeth and implants.
    Kasai K; Takayama Y; Yokoyama A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 22442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis.
    Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
    Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e833-7. PubMed ID: 21981046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of 1-piece superstructure on mandibular flexure.
    Naini RB; Nokar S
    Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 22129961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress and strain analysis of the bone-implant interface: a comparison of fiber-reinforced composite and titanium implants utilizing 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Shinya A; Ballo AM; Lassila LV; Shinya A; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():133-40. PubMed ID: 20545537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element analysis of bone around a dental implant supporting a crown with a premature contact.
    Chaichanasiri E; Nanakorn P; Tharanon W; Sloten JV
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Oct; 92(10):1336-44. PubMed ID: 19845242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.