260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767275)
21. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa's research and method development program.
Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Schepky A; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Maxwell G; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Reisinger K; Tailhardat M; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Winkler P
Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1465-73. PubMed ID: 20624454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Fabian E; Pachel C; Ramirez T; Wiench B; Wruck CJ; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 21669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds.
Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Ramirez T; Eltze T; Fabian E; Mehling A; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):489-504. PubMed ID: 22659254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cross talk between keratinocytes and dendritic cells: impact on the prediction of sensitization.
Hennen J; Aeby P; Goebel C; Schettgen T; Oberli A; Kalmes M; Blömeke B
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Oct; 123(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21742781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The GARD assay for assessment of chemical skin sensitizers.
Johansson H; Albrekt AS; Borrebaeck CA; Lindstedt M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Apr; 27(3):1163-9. PubMed ID: 23032079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interactions of contact allergens with dendritic cells: opportunities and challenges for the development of novel approaches to hazard assessment.
Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Gildea LA; Hulette BC; Betts CJ; Cumberbatch M; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Toxicol Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16014741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the U937 cell line for the detection of contact allergens.
Python F; Goebel C; Aeby P
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 220(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 17306317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of the sensitizing potential of chemicals by in vitro analysis of dendritic cell activation and skin penetration.
Aeby P; Wyss C; Beck H; Griem P; Scheffler H; Goebel C
J Invest Dermatol; 2004 May; 122(5):1154-64. PubMed ID: 15140218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition.
Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 18189367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers.
Basketter D; Maxwell G
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):359-73. PubMed ID: 18058309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sensitivity of KeratinoSens
Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Otsubo Y; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 30626776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison and validation of an in vitro skin sensitization strategy using a data set of 33 chemical references.
Clouet E; Kerdine-Römer S; Ferret PJ
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):374-385. PubMed ID: 28539215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Harvey P; Evans P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test based on ROS production in THP-1 cells.
Saito K; Miyazawa M; Nukada Y; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Mar; 27(2):857-63. PubMed ID: 23287046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of IL-18 production in a human keratinocyte cell line to discriminate contact sensitizers from irritants and low molecular weight respiratory allergens.
Corsini E; Mitjans M; Galbiati V; Lucchi L; Galli CL; Marinovich M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Aug; 23(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 19397996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
