606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21767989)
21. Cryopreserved oocytes can serve as the treatment for secondary infertility: a novel model for egg donation.
Knopman JM; Noyes N; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2413.e7-9. PubMed ID: 20097336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multicenter observational study on slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome.
Borini A; Levi Setti PE; Anserini P; De Luca R; De Santis L; Porcu E; La Sala GB; Ferraretti A; Bartolotti T; Coticchio G; Scaravelli G
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1662-8. PubMed ID: 20047739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical outcomes of a vitrified donor oocyte programme: A single UK centre experience.
Seshadri S; Saab W; Exeter H; Drew E; Petrie A; Davies M; Serhal P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():136-140. PubMed ID: 29709727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method.
Cobo A; Kuwayama M; Pérez S; Ruiz A; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1657-64. PubMed ID: 17889865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Report of four donor-recipient oocyte cryopreservation cycles resulting in high pregnancy and implantation rates.
Barritt J; Luna M; Duke M; Grunfeld L; Mukherjee T; Sandler B; Copperman AB
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):189.e13-7. PubMed ID: 17094985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes.
Lucena E; Bernal DP; Lucena C; Rojas A; Moran A; Lucena A
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jan; 85(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 16412739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New national outcome data on fresh versus cryopreserved donor oocytes.
Kushnir VA; Darmon SK; Barad DH; Gleicher N
J Ovarian Res; 2018 Jan; 11(1):2. PubMed ID: 29304839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cryopreserved oocytes: update on clinical applications and success rates.
Paramanantham J; Talmor AJ; Osianlis T; Weston GC
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2015 Feb; 70(2):97-114. PubMed ID: 25671372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fresh oocyte cycles yield improved embryo quality compared with frozen oocyte cycles in an egg-sharing donation programme.
Setti AS; Braga DPAF; Iaconelli A; Borges E
Zygote; 2021 Jun; 29(3):234-238. PubMed ID: 33455591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate.
Cobo A; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1426-34.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26353081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Current results with slow freezing and vitrification of the human oocyte.
Boldt J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Sep; 23(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 21592862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Egg donation of vitrified oocytes bank produces similar pregnancy rates by blastocyst transfer when compared to fresh cycle.
Domingues TS; Aquino AP; Barros B; Mazetto R; Nicolielo M; Kimati CM; Devecchi T; Bonetti TCS; Serafini PC; Motta ELA
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Nov; 34(11):1553-1557. PubMed ID: 28815355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Human oocyte cryopreservation.
Tao T; Zhang W; Del Valle A
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 21(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 19276807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro oocyte fertilization and subsequent embryonic development after cryopreservation of bovine ovarian tissue, using an effective approach for oocyte collection.
Faheem MS; Carvalhais I; Chaveiro A; Moreira da Silva F
Anim Reprod Sci; 2011 May; 125(1-4):49-55. PubMed ID: 21411252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Current status of human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation.
Herrero L; Martínez M; Garcia-Velasco JA
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 23(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21734500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome.
De Munck N; Belva F; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G; Stoop D
Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 26936884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pregnancy potential of human oocytes--the effect of cryopreservation.
Levran D; Dor J; Rudak E; Nebel L; Ben-Shlomo I; Ben-Rafael Z; Mashiach S
N Engl J Med; 1990 Oct; 323(17):1153-6. PubMed ID: 2215592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Oocyte cryopreservation: advances and drawbacks.
Dovey S
Minerva Ginecol; 2012 Dec; 64(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 23232533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation.
Borini A; Cattoli M; Bulletti C; Coticchio G
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1127():49-58. PubMed ID: 18443329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
