These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21768064)

  • 41. The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants' Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction.
    Bian R; Lin P; Gao Q; Li J; Yang X
    J Psychol; 2020; 154(2):176-198. PubMed ID: 31738655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment.
    Ackerman R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1349-68. PubMed ID: 24364687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Truthiness, the illusory truth effect, and the role of need for cognition.
    Newman EJ; Jalbert MC; Schwarz N; Ly DP
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Feb; 78():102866. PubMed ID: 31935624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Positive and negative emotion enhances the processing of famous faces in a semantic judgment task.
    Bate S; Haslam C; Hodgson TL; Jansari A; Gregory N; Kay J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Jan; 24(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 20063949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Constructive biases in social judgment: experiments on the self-verification of question contents.
    Fiedler K; Armbruster T; Nickel S; Walther E; Asbeck J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Nov; 71(5):861-73. PubMed ID: 8939037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Scope of Our Affective Influences: When and How Naturally Occurring Positive, Negative, and Neutral Affects Alter Judgment.
    Gasper K; Danube CL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Mar; 42(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 26865292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Judgment and judgment latency for freedom and responsibility relatedness as a function of subtle linguistic variations.
    Wilkerson K; McGahan JR; Stevens R; Williamson D; Low J
    J Psychol; 2009 Dec; 143(6):641-56. PubMed ID: 19957880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency.
    Unkelbach C
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Apr; 17(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 16623692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect.
    Unkelbach C; Stahl C
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 18980847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Repetition increases both the perceived truth and fakeness of information: An ecological account.
    Corneille O; Mierop A; Unkelbach C
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104470. PubMed ID: 33007659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of processing fluency on comparative performance judgments.
    Reber R; Meier B; Ruch-Monachon MA; Tiberini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 16554016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cognitive responses to positively and negatively framed health messages: a thought-listing study.
    Brown MG; Gold RS
    Psychol Health Med; 2014; 19(6):724-9. PubMed ID: 24345327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evidence for a neural correlate of a framing effect: bias-specific activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during credibility judgments.
    Deppe M; Schwindt W; Krämer J; Kugel H; Plassmann H; Kenning P; Ringelstein EB
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Nov; 67(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 16216688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
    Evans LM; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of response bias and judgment framing on operator use of an automated aid in a target detection task.
    Rice S; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):320-31. PubMed ID: 21707202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Truth by repetition … Without repetition: Testing the effect of instructed repetition on truth judgments.
    Mattavelli S; Corneille O; Unkelbach C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1264-1279. PubMed ID: 36006728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing and skin cancer prevention: a test of the congruency hypothesis.
    Hevey D; Dolan M
    J Health Psychol; 2014 Aug; 19(8):1003-12. PubMed ID: 23682057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Getting the message across: age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages.
    Shamaskin AM; Mikels JA; Reed AE
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):746-51. PubMed ID: 20677886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Educational storylines in entertainment television: audience reactions toward persuasive strategies in medical dramas.
    Asbeek Brusse ED; Fransen ML; Smit EG
    J Health Commun; 2015 Apr; 20(4):396-405. PubMed ID: 25584930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.