These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21768625)

  • 41. Comparative analysis of osseointegration in various types of acetabular implant materials.
    Bondarenko S; Dedukh N; Filipenko V; Akonjom M; Badnaoui AA; Schwarzkopf R
    Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(6):622-628. PubMed ID: 29742946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cemented all-polyethylene acetabular implants vs other forms of acetabular fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Voigt JD; Mosier MC
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Sep; 27(8):1544-1553.e10. PubMed ID: 22333867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Change in CT-measured acetabular bone density following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Robertson TS; Pijls BG; Munn Z; Solomon LB; Nelissen RGHH; Callary SA
    Acta Orthop; 2023 Apr; 94():191-199. PubMed ID: 37114317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bony ingrowth fixation of newly designed acetabular components in a canine model.
    Hedley AK; Kabo M; Kim W; Coster I; Amstutz HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):12-23. PubMed ID: 6851313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model.
    Bobyn JD; Toh KK; Hacking SA; Tanzer M; Krygier JJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Apr; 14(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 10220190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed and stemmed tibial components in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Rodriguez JA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 May; 84(4):619; author reply 619. PubMed ID: 12043791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. High-precision measurements of cementless acetabular components using model-based RSA: an experimental study.
    Baad-Hansen T; Kold S; Kaptein BL; Søballe K
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 17965999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Porous Coatings in Retrieved Acetabular Components.
    Baral EC; Trivellas M; Vigdorchik JM; Ricciardi BF; Wright TM; Padgett DE
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Aug; 35(8):2254-2258. PubMed ID: 32307292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component.
    Asai S; Sobue Y; Asai N; Takahashi N; Watanabe T; Matsumoto T; Ishiguro N; Kojima T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 81(1):159-163. PubMed ID: 30962665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Acetabulum deformations after implantation of a cemented cup with or without metal-back component. An in vitro comparative study of monopodal load].
    Vandenbussche E; Peraldi P; Massin P; Augereau B; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 9452792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of acetabular stability in uncemented prostheses.
    Clarke HJ; Jinnah RH; Warden KE; Cox QG; Curtis MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1991 Dec; 6(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 1770370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pedersen DR; Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(4):305-15. PubMed ID: 7096385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Experimental study of periacetabular deformations before and after implantation of hip prostheses.
    Massin P; Vandenbussche E; Landjerit B; Augereau B
    J Biomech; 1996 Jan; 29(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 8839017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fixation with biodegradable devices of acetabular components in a canine model.
    Otsuka NY; Binnington AG; Fornasier VL; Davey JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):250-5. PubMed ID: 8070204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of structural and mechanical properties in cancellous bone from the femoral head and acetabulum.
    Thompson MS; Flivik G; Juliusson R; Odgaard A; Ryd L
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(6):425-9. PubMed ID: 15648666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions.
    Ghosh R; Gupta S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():257-269. PubMed ID: 24508712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors That Influence Bone-Ingrowth Fixation of Press-Fit Acetabular Cups.
    Wiznia DH; Schwarzkopf R; Iorio R; Long WJ
    JBJS Rev; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e2. PubMed ID: 31166219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of Implant Surface Texture Design on Peri-Acetabular Bone Ingrowth: A Mechanobiology Based Finite Element Analysis.
    Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Mar; 139(3):. PubMed ID: 27925634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hip resurfacing: a 40-year perspective.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    HSS J; 2012 Oct; 8(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 24082872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Combined Bone Ingrowth and Remodeling Around Uncemented Acetabular Component: A Multiscale Mechanobiology-Based Finite Element Analysis.
    Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Sep; 139(9):. PubMed ID: 28696483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.