103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21768627)
1. Impaction bone grafting: a laboratory comparison of two methods.
Putzer D; Mayr E; Haid C; Reinthaler A; Nogler M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1049-53. PubMed ID: 21768627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural characteristics of impaction allografting for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Robinson MC; Fernlund G; Dominic Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 16023774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Larger bone graft size and washing of bone grafts prior to impaction enhances the initial stability of cemented cups: experiments using a synthetic acetabular model.
Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 16752283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur.
Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi SP; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 17540758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure during compaction of morsellised bone gives an increase in stiffness: an in vitro study.
Lunde KB; Kaehler N; Rønningen H; Fosse L
J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):231-4. PubMed ID: 17692853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of impaction grafting: the when and how.
Haddad FS; Rayan F
Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstruction of femoral defects in revision hip surgery: risk of fracture and stem migration after impaction bone grafting.
Barker R; Takahashi T; Toms A; Gregson P; Kuiper JH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 16720783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orthopaedic manifestations of the hip in haemophilia--impaction bone grafting used in revision total hip arthroplasty in a haemophilic patient.
Hope B; Halliday B
Haemophilia; 2005 Mar; 11(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 15810921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impaction bone grafting.
Schreurs BW; Buma P
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Dec; 72(6):661-3. PubMed ID: 11817885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Particle size influence in an impaction bone grafting model. Comparison of fresh-frozen and freeze-dried allografts.
Cornu O; Schubert T; Libouton X; Manil O; Godts B; Van Tomme J; Banse X; Delloye C
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2238-42. PubMed ID: 19656513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaction allografting in revision total hip replacement.
Board TN; Rooney P; Kearney JN; Kay PR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jul; 88(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 16798983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The mechanical stability of allografts after a cleaning process: comparison of two preparation modes.
Putzer D; Huber DC; Wurm A; Schmoelz W; Nogler M
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1642-6. PubMed ID: 24793889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D non-linear analysis of the acetabular construct following impaction grafting.
Phillips AT; Pankaj P; Howie CR; Usmani AS; Simpson AH
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Jun; 9(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 16880163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of vibration on the shear strength of impacted bone graft in revision hip surgery.
Brennan SA; Brabazon D; O'Byrne JM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jun; 93(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 21586773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting stiffness properties in impacted morsellized bone used in revision hip surgery: an experimental in vitro study.
Fosse L; Rønningen H; Benum P; Lydersen S; Sandven RB
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug; 78(2):423-31. PubMed ID: 16739109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vitro study of medial strain distribution in the femur during impaction grafting.
Mak SY; Holsgrove TP; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Aug; 221(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 17937200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years.
Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Onishi E; Nakamura T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17259411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
