These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21768731)

  • 1. Hearing speech in music.
    Ekström SR; Borg E
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(53):277-85. PubMed ID: 21768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Dreschler WA; Verschuure H; Ludvigsen C; Westermann S
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):148-57. PubMed ID: 11465297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing impairment and self-masking: listening during vocalization.
    Borg E; Wikström C; Gustafsson D
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 22686438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severe difficulties with word recognition in noise after platinum chemotherapy in childhood, and improvements with open-fitting hearing-aids.
    Einarsson EJ; Petersen H; Wiebe T; Fransson PA; Magnusson M; Moëll C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):642-51. PubMed ID: 21812630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The effect of different types of music on the perception of speech information].
    Tsaneva L; Danev S
    Probl Khig; 1995; 20():116-21. PubMed ID: 8524734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
    Magnusson L
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.