156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21771247)
1. Postoperative systems models more accurately predict risk of significant disease progression than standard risk groups and a 10-year postoperative nomogram: potential impact on the receipt of adjuvant therapy after surgery.
Donovan MJ; Khan FM; Powell D; Bayer-Zubek V; Cordon-Cardo C; Costa J; Eastham J; Scardino P
BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21771247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A validation of two preoperative nomograms predicting recurrence following radical prostatectomy in a cohort of European men.
Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Cagiannos I; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Fernandez S; Noldus J; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
Urol Oncol; 2002; 7(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 12474529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the Kattan nomogram across prostate cancer risk-groups.
Korets R; Motamedinia P; Yeshchina O; Desai M; McKiernan JM
BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 21062396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.
Mitchell JA; Cooperberg MR; Elkin EP; Lubeck DP; Mehta SS; Kane CJ; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1126-31. PubMed ID: 15758720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An external validation of the Candiolo nomogram in a cohort of prostate cancer patients treated by external-beam radiotherapy.
Gabriele D; Guarneri A; Bartoncini S; Munoz F; Tamponi M; Russo F; Stamatakos G; Guiot C; Regge D; Ricardi U
Radiat Oncol; 2021 May; 16(1):85. PubMed ID: 33952288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR-based prognostic nomogram for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Zhang YD; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Li H; Wang XN; Liu XS; Shi HB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):586-596. PubMed ID: 27654116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Dell'Oglio P; Tian Z; Schiffmann J; Shariat SF; Suardi N; Francesco M; Alberto B; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Budäus L; Karakiewicz PI
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27289238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimum Tools for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Accuracy and Validity.
Campbell JM; Raymond E; O'Callaghan ME; Vincent AD; Beckmann KR; Roder D; Evans S; McNeil J; Millar J; Zalcberg J; Borg M; Moretti KL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Oct; 15(5):e827-e834. PubMed ID: 28666689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene based prediction of clinically localized prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.
Talantov D; Jatkoe TA; Böhm M; Zhang Y; Ferguson AM; Stricker PD; Kattan MW; Sutherland RL; Kench JG; Wang Y; Henshall SM
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1521-8. PubMed ID: 20723930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative prostate-specific antigen nadir improves accuracy for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) and Duke Prostate Center databases.
Moreira DM; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Sun LL; Moul JW; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):914-22. PubMed ID: 20880361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost effectiveness of risk-prediction tools in selecting patients for immediate post-prostatectomy treatment.
Zubek VB; Konski A
Mol Diagn Ther; 2009; 13(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 19351214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construction of a Preoperative Radiologic-Risk Signature for Predicting the Pathologic Status of Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy.
Qi L; Wu CJ; Zhang J; Bao ML; Yan X; Zhang YD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):805-811. PubMed ID: 29995494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying the Most Informative Prediction Tool for Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Three Commonly Used Preoperative Prediction Models.
Boehm K; Larcher A; Beyer B; Tian Z; Tilki D; Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Budäus L
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 26272236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving risk stratification in patients with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a nomogram predicting the risk of biopsy progression.
Iremashvili V; Burdick-Will J; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 23551868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of two preoperative Kattan nomograms predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in Turkey: a multicenter study of the Uro-oncology Society.
Eskicorapci SY; Türkeri L; Karabulut E; Cal C; Akpinar H; Baltaci S; Baykal K; ; Kattan MW; Ozen H
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1289-95. PubMed ID: 19589584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
